...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological processes >Summer evapotranspiration in western Siberia: a comparison between eddy covariance and Penman method formulations
【24h】

Summer evapotranspiration in western Siberia: a comparison between eddy covariance and Penman method formulations

机译:夏天蒸散在西伯利亚西部:a涡度相关之间的比较和书法家法公式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Evapotranspiration is difficult to quantify because of the many factors and complex processes that influence it. Several empirical methods have been developed over the years to estimate potential evapotranspiration based on easily available parameters. Directly measured data of actual evapotranspiration have been rather sparse in the past and still need to be improved in particular regions like western Siberia. The transition zone between the warm temperate and cold temperate continental climates is very sensitive to climate change, and water stress is an increasingly important issue in these regions with a highly dynamic agricultural activity. So there is a growing need to estimate actual evapotranspiration. Widely usable approximations are needed. In this study, the values of potential evapotranspiration computed with the original version, and eight modifications of the Penman formulation were compared and related to the actual evapotranspiration measured by eddy covariance over a grassland area in western Siberia. The original 1948 and 1963 Penman formulations are best for estimating potential evapotranspiration in the transition zone between the forest steppes and the pre-taiga. A nearly linear relationship between the potential and actual evapotranspiration was found. A simple modification of the Penman equation (i.e. the multiplication of the result by a factor of 0.47) is suggested for approximating the actual evapotranspiration based on standard meteorological data for the region. The original Penman formulation is most robust and will provide the widest applicability in the future under changing climate and environmental conditions. In this context, it is further recommended not to neglect the ventilation term of the Penman equation, which is often assumed to be negligibly small. A detailed correlation analysis showed that under dry soil conditions, the vegetation largely contributed to the actual evapotranspiration and, in contrast to widely held expectations, that the Penman equation is best adapted to vegetated surfaces. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:蒸散是很难量化因为许多因素和复杂的过程影响它。了多年来估计潜在蒸散的基础上很容易可用参数。实际蒸散,而稀疏在过去,仍然需要改进特别像西伯利亚西部地区。暖温带和之间的过渡区冷温带大陆气候非常对气候变化敏感,和水压力在这些地区的一个日益重要的问题高度动态的农业活动。越来越多的需要估计实际土壤水分蒸发蒸腾损失总量。是必要的。潜在蒸散计算的原始版本,八个修改的笔者制定比较和相关艾迪的实际蒸散量协方差西部草原地区西伯利亚。配方是最好的估计的潜力土壤水分蒸发蒸腾损失总量之间的过渡区森林草原和pre-taiga。潜力和之间的线性关系实际蒸散。修改(即笔者方程乘法运算结果的0.47倍)近似实际的建议吗土壤水分蒸发蒸腾损失总量根据标准为该地区的气象数据。笔者配方是最健壮和意志在未来提供最广泛的适用性在气候变化和环境条件。建议不要忽视通风笔者的方程,通常假定是极小的。分析表明,在干燥的土壤条件下,植被在很大程度上导致了实际土壤水分蒸发蒸腾损失总量,与广泛预期,笔者方程最好的适应植被表面。2015年约翰·威利& Sons有限公司

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号