首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Best Methods of Communicating Clinical Trial Data to Improve Understanding of Treatments for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
【24h】

Best Methods of Communicating Clinical Trial Data to Improve Understanding of Treatments for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

机译:最好的交流临床试验数据的方法提高治疗的理解多发性硬化患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Patients' understanding of treatment risks and benefits is a prerequisite for shared decision making. Yet, patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) do not accurately understand treatment information provided in regular clinical consultations. Objectives: To identify the best methods of communicating clinical trial data to improve the understanding of treatments among patients with MS and to also examine the relationship between patients' understanding with decisional conflict, individual traits, and MS symptoms. Methods: A repeated-measures study was used. A sample of relapsing-remitting patients with MS was recruited from National Health Service sites in the United Kingdom. Patients were presented with hypothetical treatment risks and benefits from faux clinical trials. Treatments were communicated using absolute terms, relative terms, and numbers needed to treat/harm. The presence of baseline information with each method was also manipulated. Patients' understanding and conflict in treatment decisions were assessed. Individual traits and MS symptoms were also recorded. Results: Understanding was better when treatments were communicated in absolute terms (mean 3.99 +/- 0.93) compared with relative terms (mean 2.93 +/- 0.91; P 0.001) and numbers needed to treat/harm (mean 2.89 +/- 0.88; P 0.001). Adding baseline information to all methods significantly improved understanding (mean 5.04 +/- 0.96) compared with no baseline information (mean 1.50 +/- 0.74; P 0.001). Understanding was not related to conflict in treatment decisions (r = -0.131; P = 0.391). Numeracy, IQ and cognitive impairments were significantly related to patients' understanding of treatments. Conclusions: Treatment risks and benefits should ideally be communicated using absolute terms, alongside baseline information. Patients with MS with low numeracy, low IQ and reduced cognitive skills should be supported during treatment education.
机译:背景:治疗病人的理解风险和利益是共享的先决条件决策。硬化症(MS)不准确的理解提供的信息在常规治疗临床咨询。最好的沟通方法的临床试验数据以改进治疗方法的理解在MS患者和也检查病人的理解之间的关系决策冲突,个人特征,和女士症状。使用。从国家卫生与女士招募服务网站在英国。与假设提出了治疗风险从人造临床试验和福利。治疗使用绝对是沟通方面,相对而言,需要数量治疗/伤害。与每个方法也操纵。理解和治疗决策冲突被评估。也被记录下来。更好的治疗沟通时绝对值(平均3.99 + / - 0.93)相比相对而言(平均2.93 + / - 0.91;和数字需要治疗/伤害(平均2.89 + / -0.88;所有方法显著改善理解(平均5.04 + / - 0.96)相比没有基准信息(平均1.50 + / - 0.74;& 冲突处理决策(r = -0.131;0.391)。患者有显著相关对治疗方法的理解。理想情况下应该治疗的风险和好处沟通使用绝对值,旁边基线信息。计算能力、低智商和认知能力下降治疗期间应支持教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号