...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
【24h】

Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.

机译:单列修改mason-allen与双排关节镜肩袖修复:生物力学和表面积比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the time-zero biomechanical strength and the surface area of repair between a single-row modified Mason-Allen rotator cuff repair and a double-row arthroscopic repair. METHODS: Six matched pairs of sheep infraspinatus tendons were repaired by both techniques. Pressure-sensitive film was used to measure the surface area of repair for each configuration. Specimens were biomechanically tested with cyclic loading from 20 N to 30 N for 20 cycles and were loaded to failure at a rate of 1 mm/s. Failure was defined at 5 mm of gap formation. RESULTS: Double-row suture anchor fixation restored a mean surface area of 258.23 +/- 69.7 mm(2) versus 148.08 +/- 75.5 mm(2) for single-row fixation, a 74% increase (P = .025). Both repairs had statistically similar time-zero biomechanics. There was no statistical difference in peak-to-peak displacement or elongation during cyclic loading. Single-row fixation showed a higher mean load to failure (110.26 +/- 26.4 N) than double-row fixation (108.93 +/- 21.8 N). This was not statistically significant (P = .932). All specimens failed at the suture-tendon interface. CONCLUSIONS: Double-row suture anchor fixation restores a greater percentage of the anatomic footprint when compared with a single-row Mason-Allen technique. The time-zero biomechanical strength was not significantly different between the 2 study groups. This study suggests that the 2 factors are independent of each other. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surface area and biomechanical strength of fixation are 2 independent factors in the outcome of rotator cuff repair. Maximizing both factors may increase the likelihood of complete tendon-bone healing and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. For smaller tears, a single-row modified Mason-Allen suture technique may provide sufficient strength, but for large amenable tears, a double row can provide both strength and increased surface area for healing.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较时刻0生物力学强度和表面积之间的修复一个单列修改Mason-Allen肩袖修复和双排修复关节镜。配对的绵羊冈下肌腱通过这两种技术修复。电影是用来测量的表面积为每个配置修复。生物力学测试和循环荷载20到30 N 20周期和被加载失败1毫米/秒的速度。在5毫米的差距的形成。缝合锚固定恢复平均表面面积258.23 + / - 69.7毫米(2)和148.08 + / -75.5毫米(2)单列固定,74%增加(P = .025)。统计上类似的时刻0生物力学。没有统计学差异峰位移或伸长循环加载。更高的平均失效到达负载(110.26 + / - 26.4 N)比双排固定(108.93 + / - 21.8 N)。这不是显著(P =.932)。接口。固定恢复的比例更大解剖足迹相比的单列Mason-Allen技术。生物力学强度没有明显2学习小组之间的不同。表明这两个因素是独立的对方。固定的生物力学强度是2独立因素旋转的结果袖口修复。完成tendon-bone愈合的可能性并最终改善临床结果。较小的眼泪,单列Mason-Allen修改缝合技术可能提供足够的强度,但是对于大型的眼泪,双排提供强度和增加表面积疗愈。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号