...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system.
【24h】

Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system.

机译:术中比较之间的膝盖松弛前交叉ligament-reconstructed膝盖和使用导航侧稳定的膝盖系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees and contralateral stable knees by use of intraoperative navigation. METHODS: Five patients with ipsilateral ACL-deficient knees with contralateral stable knees without any ligament injuries were included in this study. Anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity during anterior drawer force applied manually and range of tibial rotation and AP knee laxity during internal and external rotational torque applied manually in both the ACL-deficient knee and the contralateral stable knee were measured by use of a navigation system from 15 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. After the temporary fixation of the posterolateral bundle, anteromedial bundle (AMB), or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction, knee laxity was measured again and compared with that of the stable knee. RESULTS: The mean laxities for PLB reconstruction were significantly greater than those of the contralateral stable knee at more than 75 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). The mean laxities for AMB or DB reconstruction were not significantly different from those of the contralateral stable knee at all knee flexion angles. Those for AMB reconstruction were within +1.6 mm and those for DB reconstruction were within -2.0 mm of those of the contralateral stable knee. The mean rotations for all reconstructions were significantly less than those of the contralateral stable knee at less than 30 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: DB and AMB reconstructions could restore knee laxity closer to the level of the contralateral stable knee. Because normal knee laxity is different in each individual, evaluation of contralateral stable knee laxity during ACL reconstruction surgery would be helpful for restoration to the level of the specific preinjury knee laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较膝前交叉之间松弛膝盖韧带(ACL)重建侧膝盖利用稳定术中导航。与同侧ACL-deficient膝盖侧稳定膝盖韧带伤势纳入本研究。前后的(美联社)在前膝盖松弛抽屉力应用手动和胫骨的范围在内部和旋转和美联社膝盖松弛外部应用手动旋转扭矩ACL-deficient膝盖和侧稳定的膝盖被使用的导航测量系统从15度到90度的膝盖弯曲。后外侧的包入包(AMB),或double-bundle (DB)重建,膝盖松弛再次测量和比较的吗稳定的膝盖。重建明显大于侧的膝盖更稳定膝盖弯曲超过75度(P < . 05)。意味着AMB松弛或DB重建没有显著不同的侧稳定的膝盖,膝盖弯曲角度。+ 1.6毫米和DB的重建在-2.0毫米的侧稳定的膝盖。重建明显不足这些侧稳定膝关节的更少超过30度的膝盖弯曲(P < . 05)。结论:DB和AMB重建恢复膝关节松弛接近的水平侧稳定的膝盖。对于每个个体来说,松弛是不同的评价侧稳定膝关节松弛在ACL重建手术有助于恢复的水平具体的受伤前膝盖松弛。证据:IV级,治疗病例系列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号