...
【24h】

Biomechanical stability of knotless suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair in healthy and osteopenic bone.

机译:没有结的缝合锚的生物力学稳定性在健康和肩袖修复使用osteopenic骨头。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The primary stability of 5 new knotless suture anchors was compared in healthy and osteopenic humeri by use of the following anchor systems: Opus Magnum 2 (ArthroCare, Austin, TX), PushLock (Arthrex, Naples, FL), SwiveLock (Arthrex), Kinsa RC (Smith & Nephew, London, England), and Versalok (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA). METHODS: Twenty healthy and 20 osteopenic, macroscopically intact humeri with mean ages of 47 and 72 years, respectively, and mean bone mineral densities of 139.8 mg of calcium hydroxyapatite (Ca2+-HA) per milliliter and 51.8 mg of calcium hydroxyapatite per milliliter, respectively, were used. Cyclic loading was performed to simulate postoperative conditions. The maximum failure load (F(max)), the system displacement, and the modes of failure were recorded. RESULTS: SwiveLock had the highest mean F(max) in healthy humeri, followed by Versalok, PushLock, Kinsa RC, and Opus Magnum 2, with SwiveLock and Versalok being statistically superior to Opus Magnum 2. In osteopenic humeri Versalok had the highest mean F(max), followed by Opus Magnum 2, SwiveLock, Kinsa RC, and PushLock, with no significant differences between all tested anchors. The Versalok anchor showed the shortest system displacement in healthy humeri, with 1.06 mm, and in osteopenic humeri, with 1.47 mm. In healthy humeri the system displacement of all anchors lay under the clinical failure threshold of 5 mm. In osteopenic humeri the PushLock clearly exceeded the clinical failure threshold, with 16.11 mm, whereas the other anchors were notably below the 5-mm threshold, with solitary measurements exceeding it. CONCLUSIONS: Every tested anchor presented different problems that may lead to premature failure of the rotator cuff reconstruction. Knotless suture anchors show differences in primary stability depending on the bone quality of the greater tuberosity, the anchorage mechanism in the bone, the suture-retaining mechanism, and the anchor design. Nevertheless, cortical screw type and subcortical wedging anchors tend to show better primary stability than other designs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anchor design and bone quality play important roles in the stability of the rotator cuff repair.
机译:目的:5的主要稳定新没有结的缝合锚比较健康osteopenic肱骨利用下面的锚系统:作品大酒瓶2 (ArthroCare、奥斯汀、TX),PushLock (Arthrex、那不勒斯、FL) SwiveLock(Arthrex) Kinsa RC (Smith &侄子,伦敦,英格兰),Versalok (DePuy Mitek,雷纳姆,马)。宏观上完整的肱骨的平均年龄47岁,72年,分别指的是骨头矿物的密度139.8毫克的钙hydroxyapatite (Ca2 + 8)欲milliliter及51公顷。毫克每毫升的羟磷灰石钙,分别使用。执行模拟术后情况。最大的破坏载荷(F (max))系统位移,失败的模式记录下来。F (max)在健康肱骨,其次是Versalok,PushLock Kinsa RC,作品大酒瓶2,SwiveLock和Versalok被统计优于作品大酒瓶2。Versalok意味着F (max)最高,其次是作品大酒瓶2 SwiveLock Kinsa RC, PushLock,之间没有显著差异测试了锚。在健康的肱骨,最短系统位移与1.06毫米,osteopenic肱骨,1.47毫米。在健康肱骨系统位移所有锚躺下临床失败5毫米的阈值。PushLock显然超过了临床失败阈值,16.11毫米,而另一个锚是明显低于5毫米的阈值,与单独测量超过它。结论:每个测试锚不同的问题,可能导致过早肌腱重建的失败。没有结的缝合锚显示差异主要根据骨质量稳定大结节,安克雷奇机制的骨头,suture-retaining机制,锚的设计。皮质螺钉类型和皮层下楔入主持人往往显示更好的基本稳定比其他的设计。设计和骨质量发挥着重要作用肩袖修复的稳定性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号