...
【24h】

Femoral nerve block use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

机译:股神经阻滞在前交叉使用韧带重建手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine whether femoral nerve blocks (FNBs) provide patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction greater pain relief or other benefits compared with more standard pain medication regimens. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database using the following search terms: "ACL or anterior cruciate ligament" and "femoral nerve block or peripheral nerve block" or "regional anesthesia." Thirteen studies were found that fit the inclusion criteria of being randomized controlled trials with a Level of Evidence of I or II, comparing FNB or 3-in-1 blocks with control groups undergoing various multimodal pain regimens. RESULTS: Only 5 of the 13 studies found a significant difference in pain relief with FNB compared with the control groups; however, the difference in several of the studies may not be clinically relevant. Of the 13 studies, 6 examined parameters other than pain, and only 1 study found a greater incidence of nausea and sedation in its control group. Patient satisfaction was examined in 2 studies, with both finding no difference between groups. Nine studies used a single graft type, and the two studies using multiple graft types accounted for this in their analyses. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the available Level I and II data from randomized controlled trials, there appears to be no evidence that FNBs add additional benefit over multimodal analgesia. FNBs have not been shown to significantly affect patient pain, readiness for discharge, or outcome scores. There is a small but identifiable risk associated with performing FNBs, with potentially catastrophic effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II randomized controlled trials with minimal heterogeneity.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定股神经是否块(fnb)提供的病人接受前交叉韧带重建更大的疼痛或其他福利与标准更多的痛苦药物治疗方案。EMBASE,科克伦数据库使用搜索词:“ACL或前交叉韧带”和“股神经阻滞或外围神经阻滞”或“区域麻醉。”研究发现,包容标准的随机对照试验证据级别为I或II,比较与对照组FNB或3-in-1块经历各种痛苦多通道方案。结果:13研究发现只有5显著差异与FNB缓解疼痛与对照组相比,不同的几个研究可能不是临床相关。检查参数除了疼痛,只有1研究发现更恶心和发病率镇静的对照组。2研究满意度调查,发现组间没有差异。研究使用单个移植类型,两个研究使用多个移植类型占他们的分析。I和II的数据可用的水平随机对照试验,这似乎是没有证据表明fnb添加额外的好处多模式镇痛。严重影响病人痛苦,准备放电,或结果的分数。但可识别风险与执行相关联fnb,潜在的灾难性的影响。证据等级:II级,系统的回顾I和II级随机对照试验最小的异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号