首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
【24h】

Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.

机译:计算层析结肠镜筛查结直肠癌,癌症,和光学纤维动脉瘤:模型模拟成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In addition to detecting colorectal neoplasia, abdominal computed tomography (CT) with colonography technique (CTC) can also detect unsuspected extracolonic cancers and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this combined abdominal CT screening strategy are unknown. METHODS: A computerized Markov model was constructed to simulate the occurrence of colorectal neoplasia, extracolonic malignant neoplasm, and AAA in a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 subjects from the United States who were 50 years of age. Simulated screening with CTC, using a 6-mm polyp size threshold for reporting, was compared with a competing model of optical colonoscopy (OC), both without and with abdominal ultrasonography for AAA detection (OC-US strategy). RESULTS: In the simulated population, CTC was the dominant screening strategy, gaining an additional 1458 and 462 life-years compared with the OC and OC-US strategies and being less costly, with a savings of Dollars 266 and Dollars 449 per person, respectively. The additional gains for CTC were largely due to a decrease in AAA-related deaths, whereas the modeled benefit from extracolonic cancer downstaging was a relatively minor factor. At sensitivity analysis, OC-US became more cost-effective only when the CTC sensitivity for large polyps dropped to 61% or when broad variations of costs were simulated, such as an increase in CTC cost from Dollars 814 to Dollars 1300 or a decrease in OC cost from Dollars 1100 to Dollars 500.With the OC-US approach, suboptimal compliance had a strong negative influence on efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The estimated mortality from CT-induced cancer was less than estimated colonoscopy-related mortality (8 vs 22 deaths), both of which were minor compared with the positive benefit from screening. CONCLUSION: When detection of extracolonic findings such as AAA and extracolonic cancer are considered in addition to colorectal neoplasia in our model simulation, CT colonography is a dominant screening strategy (ie, more clinically effective and more cost-effective) over both colonoscopy and colonoscopy with 1-time ultrasonography.
机译:背景:除了检测大肠癌瘤,腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)结肠镜技术(CTC)也可以检测到不受怀疑的光学纤维癌症和腹部主动脉瘤(AAA)。成本效益的腹部CT相结合筛查策略是未知的。电脑化的马尔可夫模型构造模拟结直肠肿瘤的发生,光学纤维恶性肿瘤,和AAA假设的队列的100000例50岁的美国人。筛选与CTC,使用6毫米息肉大小阈值报告,相比之下竞争模型的光学结肠镜检查(OC)没有和腹部超声AAA检测(OC-US策略)。模拟人口,CTC是占主导地位的筛选策略,获得一个额外的1458人和462 OC和OC-US相比寿命策略和成本更低,储蓄每人449美元和266美元,分别。很大程度上是由于AAA-related减少死亡,而建模从光学纤维中获益癌症争取降期可射频消融是一个相对次要的因素。在灵敏度分析,OC-US变得更多具有成本效益的只有当CTC的敏感性大息肉或者当广泛下降至61%模拟变化的成本,如一个CTC增加成本从814美元美元1300 OC成本从1100美元下降到500美元。次优的合规有强烈的负面影响疗效和成本效益。估计CT-induced癌症死亡率不到估计colonoscopy-related死亡率(8 vs 22人死亡),这两个是次要的相比之下,正从中受益筛选。比如AAA和光学纤维的发现癌症被认为是除了光学纤维结直肠肿瘤在我们的模型模拟,CT结肠镜是占主导地位的筛选策略(即临床更有效对结肠镜检查和成本效益)结肠镜检查1次超声。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号