首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Treatment success in cancer: new cancer treatment successes identified in phase 3 randomized controlled trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative oncology groups, 1955 to 2006.
【24h】

Treatment success in cancer: new cancer treatment successes identified in phase 3 randomized controlled trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative oncology groups, 1955 to 2006.

机译:成功治疗癌症:新的癌症治疗成功在阶段3随机确定试验由国家控制的癌症肿瘤Institute-sponsored合作组,1955年到2006年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of research output, such as estimation of the proportion of treatment successes, is of ethical, scientific, and public importance but has rarely been evaluated systematically. We assessed how often experimental cancer treatments that undergo testing in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) result in discovery of successful new interventions. METHODS: We extracted data from all completed (published and unpublished) phase 3 RCTs conducted by the National Cancer Institute cooperative groups since their inception in 1955. Therapeutic successes were determined by (1) assessing the proportion of statistically significant trials favoring new or standard treatments, (2) determining the proportion of the trials in which new treatments were considered superior to standard treatments according to the original researchers, and (3) quantitatively synthesizing data for main clinical outcomes (overall and event-free survival). RESULTS: Data from 624 trials (781 randomized comparisons) involving216 451 patients were analyzed. In all, 30% of trials had statistically significant results, of which new interventions were superior to established treatments in 80% of trials. The original researchers judged that the risk-benefit profile favored new treatments in 41% of comparisons (316 of 766). Hazard ratios for overall and event-free survival, available for 614 comparisons, were 0.95 (99% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.98) and 0.90 (99% CI, 0.87- 0.93), respectively, slightly favoring new treatments. Breakthrough interventions were discovered in 15% of trials. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 25% to 50% of new cancer treatments that reach the stage of assessment in RCTs will prove successful. The pattern of successes has become more stable over time. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the ethical principle of equipoise defines limits of discoverability in clinical research and ultimately drives therapeutic advances in clinical medicine.
机译:背景:研究成果的评价,估计等治疗的比例成功,是道德、科学和公众但很少被评估的重要性系统。实验接受癌症治疗相关的测试随机临床试验导致成功的新发现干预措施。所有(发表和未发表的)第三阶段完成相关的由美国国家癌症研究所合作组织自1955年开办。治疗成功是取决于(1)评估数据的比例重要的试验支持新的或标准治疗,(2)确定的比例试验新疗法被认为是根据优于标准治疗最初的研究人员,和(3)定量合成数据为主要的临床结果(整体和风平浪静生存)。从624年试验(781随机比较)involving216 451名患者进行了分析。30%的试验有统计学意义结果,新的干预措施是优越的建立治疗80%的试验。最初的研究者认为风险概要文件支持新的治疗方法的41%比较(316 766)。总体上,风平浪静的生存,可用614年比较,分别为0.95(99%的信心区间[CI, 0.93 - -0.98)和0.90 (99% CI, 0.87 -0.93),分别略偏向新治疗方法。发现,在15%的试验。大约25%到50%的新的癌症治疗及评估相关的阶段被证明是成功的。随着时间的推移变得更加稳定。符合道德的假设平衡原则定义的局限性在临床研究和可发现性最终导致治疗的进步临床医学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号