首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Better outcomes for patients treated at hospitals that participate in clinical trials.
【24h】

Better outcomes for patients treated at hospitals that participate in clinical trials.

机译:对在医院治疗的患者有更好的效果参与临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Barriers to institutions participating in clinical trials include concerns about harms and costs. However, we hypothesized that patients treated at hospitals participating in trials would have better outcomes than patients treated at nonparticipating hospitals. We tested this hypothesis in 494 CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) hospitals treating 174 062 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: Hospitals were classified into tertiles by percentage of patients concurrently enrolled in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome trials. Outcomes were use of composite guideline-indicated care and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between hospital trial participation and outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 4590 patients (2.6%) were enrolled in trials, ranging from 0% (145 hospitals) to low-enrollment tertile (1.0%; interquartile range [IQR], 0.5%-1.4%; n=226) to high-enrollment tertile (4.9%; IQR, 3.5%-9.7%; n=123). The composite guideline adherence score increased with increasing tertiles of trial participation: 76.9% (IQR, 71.8%-81.3%) vs 78.3% (IQR, 73.2%-82.4%) vs 81.1% (IQR, 76.2%-84.1%) (adjusted P= .008). Hospitals that participated in trials had higher adjusted guideline adherence than nonparticipating hospitals (low enrollment, 0.8% greater [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.9% to 2.6%]; and high enrollment, 2.5% greater [95% CI, 0.5%-4.5%]). In-hospital mortality decreased with increasing trial participation: 5.9% vs 4.4% vs 3.5% (adjusted P= .003). Patients treated at hospitals that participated in trials had significantly lower mortality than patients treated at nonparticipating hospitals (low enrollment adjusted odds, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.8-1.0]; and high enrollment adjusted odds, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-0.9]). CONCLUSIONS: The CRUSADE hospitals enrolled less than 3% of their patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome into trials, and one-third never participated in trials. Compared with hospitals that do not participate in trials, those hospitals that do participate in trials seem to provide better care and to have lower mortality.
机译:背景:机构参与的障碍在临床试验中包括对危害的担忧和成本。治疗在医院参与试验比患者会有更好的结果不参加的医院。假设494年十字军(可以快速的风险分层的不稳定心绞痛患者与早期抑制不良结果实现的美国大学心脏病/美国心脏协会的指导方针)医院治疗患者174 062以上非st段抬高急性冠脉综合征。方法:医院分为tertiles比例的患者同时录取以上非st段抬高急性冠状动脉中综合症的试验。guideline-indicated护理和住院死亡率。检查医院试验之间的关系参与和结果。4590名患者(2.6%)参加试验,0%(145医院)low-enrollment不等tertile (1.0%;0.5% - -1.4%;(4.9%;指南依从性得分增加增加tertiles审判参与:76.9%(差,71.8% - -81.3%)和78.3%(-82.4%)差,73.2% vs81.1%(差,76.2% -84.1%)(P = .008调整)。有更高的医院,参与试验调整指南依从性比不参加的医院(低入学率0.8%更大(95%置信区间CI {}, -0.9%2.6%);0.5% - -4.5%)。增加审判参与:5.9% vs 4.4% vs3.5% (P = .003调整)。医院,参与试验死亡率显著低于病人不参加的医院治疗(低人数调整,0.9(95%可信区间,0.8 - -1.0);和高入学率调整赔率,0.8(95%可信区间,0.7 - -0.9])。了不到3%的患者以上非st段抬高急性冠脉综合征试验中,三分之一从不参与试用参与试验,那些做的医院参与试验似乎提供更好的保健和低死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号