...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women.
【24h】

Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women.

机译:比较2的脆弱指数的预测瀑布,残疾,在老年骨折,和死亡女性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Frailty, as defined by the index derived from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS index), predicts risk of adverse outcomes in older adults. Use of this index, however, is impractical in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 6701 women 69 years or older to compare the predictive validity of a simple frailty index with the components of weight loss, inability to rise from a chair 5 times without using arms, and reduced energy level (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures [SOF index]) with that of the CHS index with the components of unintentional weight loss, poor grip strength, reduced energy level, slow walking speed, and low level of physical activity. Women were classified as robust, of intermediate status, or frail using each index. Falls were reported every 4 months for 1 year. Disability (> or =1 new impairment in performing instrumental activities of daily living) was ascertained at 4(1/2) years, and fractures and deaths were ascertained during 9 years of follow-up. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and -2 log likelihood statistics were compared for models containing the CHS index vs the SOF index. RESULTS: Increasing evidence of frailty as defined by either the CHS index or the SOF index was similarly associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Frail women had a higher age-adjusted risk of recurrent falls (odds ratio, 2.4), disability (odds ratio, 2.2-2.8), nonspine fracture (hazard ratio, 1.4-1.5), hip fracture (hazard ratio, 1.7-1.8), and death (hazard ratio, 2.4-2.7) (P < .001 for all models). The AUC comparisons revealed no differences between models with the CHS index vs the SOF index in discriminating falls (AUC = 0.61 for both models; P = .66), disability (AUC = 0.64; P = .23), nonspine fracture (AUC = 0.55; P = .80), hip fracture (AUC 0.63; P log likelihood statistics were compared. CONCLUSION: The simple SOF index predicts risk of falls, disability, fracture, and death as well as the more complex CHS index and may provide a useful definition of frailty to identify older women at risk of adverse health outcomes in clinical practice.
机译:背景:脆弱,如定义的指数源于心血管健康研究(CHS指数),预测不良结果的风险老年人。不切实际的在临床实践中。在6701年进行了一项前瞻性队列研究女性,69岁或更老的比较预测有效性的一个简单的脆弱指数组件的减肥,不能从一把椅子5次不使用武器,减少能级(骨质疏松性骨折的研究(SOF指数))与CHS指数无意的减肥,贫穷握力、减少能量水平,缓慢的行走速度和低水平的身体活动。被列为健壮,中间吗使用每个索引状态或虚弱。报道每4个月为1年。或= 1执行工具的新障碍日常生活活动)确定4(1/2)年,骨折和死亡确定在9年的随访。曲线下(AUC)统计数据接收器操作特性曲线分析和2对数似然统计比较包含CHS指数对SOF指数模型。结果:增加脆弱的证据定义的CHS指数或SOF指数同样与风险增加有关吗不利的结果。年龄调整复发的风险下降(优势比,2.4)、残疾(优势比,2.2 - -2.8),nonspine骨折(风险比,1.4 - -1.5),髋部骨折(危险比,1.7 - -1.8),和死亡(风险比,2.4 - -2.7) (P <所有模型)的措施。比较并没有发现差异与CHS指数对SOF指数模型两种模型识别瀑布(AUC = 0.61;P =点)、残疾(AUC = 0.64;nonspine骨折(AUC = 0.55;骨折(AUC 0.63;比较。预测的风险下降,残疾,骨折,死亡以及CHS指数和更加复杂可以提供一个有用的定义脆弱确定老年妇女不良健康的风险结果在临床实践中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号