首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >The hemoglobin A1c level as a progressive risk factor for cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or death in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Program
【24h】

The hemoglobin A1c level as a progressive risk factor for cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or death in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Program

机译:糖化血红蛋白水平进步的风险因素对心血管死亡,住院治疗心脏衰竭或死亡患者慢性心力衰竭:一个分析坎地沙坦在心力衰竭:评估降低死亡率和发病率(魅力)程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: A progressive relationship between hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels and cardiovascular (CV) events has been observed in persons with and without diabetes. To our knowledge, the nature of such a relationship in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) has not been studied. METHODS: A total of 2412 participants (907 with prior diabetes) in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program with at least 1 HbA(1c) level were followed up for a median of 34 months. The incidence of the primary outcome (CV death or HF hospitalization), CV death, and total mortality was calculated according to eighths of the usual HbA(1c) level ranging from 5.8% or less to greater than 8.6%. Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios per 1% rise in HbA(1c) levels were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 99.6% of eligible participants were followed up until they developed an outcome or the study finished. The risk of the primary composite outcome, CV death,hospitalization for worsening HF, and total mortality rose progressively with higher levels of usual HbA(1c) (P for trend <.001). After age and sex were adjusted for, hazards of these outcomes per 1% higher HbA(1c) level were 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI ], 1.20-1.31), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.17-1.31), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.19-1.31), and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.16-1.29), respectively. This relationship was evident in patients with and without diabetes and with reduced or preserved ejection fraction and persisted after adjustment for diabetes, other risk factors, and allocation to candesartan. CONCLUSION: In diabetic and nondiabetic patients with symptomatic chronic HF, the HbA(1c) level is an independent progressive risk factor for CV death, hospitalization for HF, and total mortality.
机译:背景:一个进步的关系血红蛋白A (1 c) (HbA (1 c))和水平心血管事件(CV)已被观察到人有或没有糖尿病。知识,这种关系的本质慢性心力衰竭患者症状(高频)并没有被研究过。2412名参与者(907前糖尿病患者)坎地沙坦在心力衰竭:评估降低死亡率和发病率(魅力)项目至少1 HbA (1 c)水平进行了中位数的34个月。发病率的主要结果(CV死亡或心力衰竭住院),简历死亡,和总死亡率根据第八常见的计算HbA (1 c)水平从5.8%或更少大于8.6%。比例每上升1% HbA (1 c)水平计算。参与者被跟踪直到他们开发了一个结果或者研究完成。风险的主要综合结果,简历死亡,住院心衰恶化,总较高的死亡率逐渐上升的水平通常的HbA (1 c)(趋势P <措施)。和性调整的,危险的结果每高1% HbA (1 c)水平1.25(95%置信区间CI, 1.20 - -1.31), 1.2417-1 (95% CI, 1。25(95%),1月31日,我们1 19-1。31),和1.22 (95% CI, 1.16 - -1.29),分别。在和患者关系明显没有糖尿病,降低或保留射血分数和持续调整糖尿病、其他风险因素和分配坎地沙坦。非糖尿病患者慢性心力衰竭症状的患者,HbA (1 c)是一个独立的进步水平简历死亡的危险因素,为心力衰竭住院,和总死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号