...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Statistical models and patient predictors of readmission for heart failure: a systematic review.
【24h】

Statistical models and patient predictors of readmission for heart failure: a systematic review.

机译:统计模型和患者的预测因素重新接纳为心力衰竭:一个系统审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Readmission after heart failure (HF) hospitalization is an increasing focus for physicians and policy makers, but statistical models are needed to assess patient risk and to compare hospital performance. We performed a systematic review to describe models designed to compare hospital rates of readmission or to predict patients' risk of readmission, as well as to identify studies evaluating patient characteristics associated with hospital readmission, all among patients admitted for HF. METHODS: We identified relevant studies published between January 1, 1950, and November 19, 2007, by searching MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and all 4 Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Eligible English-language publications reported on readmission after HF hospitalization among adult patients. We excluded experimental studies and publications without original data or quantitative outcomes. RESULTS: From 941 potentially relevant articles, 117 met inclusion criteria: none contained models to compare readmission rates among hospitals, 5 (4.3%) presented models to predict patients' risk of readmission, and 112 (95.7%) examined patient characteristics associated with readmission. Studies varied in case identification, used multiple types of data sources, found few patient characteristics consistently associated with readmission, and examined differing outcomes, often either readmission alone or a combined outcome of readmission or death, measured across varying periods (from 14 days to 4 years). Two articles reported model discriminations of patient readmission risk, both of which were modest (C statistic, 0.60 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review identified no model designed to compare hospital rates of readmission, while models designed to predict patients' readmission risk used heterogeneous approaches and found substantial inconsistencies regarding which patient characteristics were predictive. Clinically, patient risk stratification is challenging. From a policy perspective, a validated risk-standardized statistical model to accurately profile hospitals using readmission rates is unavailable in the published English-language literature to date.
机译:背景:重新接纳后心力衰竭(HF)住院是越来越关注医生和决策者,但统计需要评估病人风险和模型医院的性能进行比较。旨在系统综述描述模型比较利率重新接纳或医院预测患者再入院的危险,以及评估病人识别研究特征与医院有关重新接纳,所有患者中高频的承认。方法:我们确定发表的相关研究在1950年1月1日和11月19日,2007年,通过搜索MEDLINE,斯高帕斯PsycINFO, 4奥维德循证医学评价。英语出版物报道成人心力衰竭住院后重新接纳病人。没有原始数据或出版物定量的结果。潜在的相关文章,117遇到了包容标准:没有包含模型进行比较重新接纳率医院,5例(4.3%)提出了模型预测病人的风险重新接纳,112例(95.7%)病人检查特征与重新接纳有关。研究不同情况下识别、使用多种类型的数据源,发现几个病人相关特征一致重新接纳,并分析了不同的结果,经常重新接纳单独或结合重新接纳或死亡的结果,测量不同时期(从14天到4年)。文章报道的鉴别模型患者再入院的风险,这两种适度的(C统计,0.60)。我们的系统回顾确认没有模型设计比较医院的比例重新接纳,而模型用来预测病人的入院率风险使用异构方法,发现重大不一致关于哪些病人特点预测。分层是具有挑战性的。的角度来看,一个risk-standardized进行验证医院统计模型来准确资料使用重新接纳率是不可用的发表的英文文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号