...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Effects of exercise modality on insulin resistance and functional limitation in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Effects of exercise modality on insulin resistance and functional limitation in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:运动形态对胰岛素抵抗的影响在老年人和功能限制:随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Authorities advocate that resistance and aerobic exercise are essential for reducing risk factors for chronic disease and disability in older adults. However, the incremental effects of combined resistance and aerobic exercise compared with either modality alone on risk factors for disease and disability is generally unknown. METHODS: Participants were 136 sedentary, abdominally obese older men and women recruited from September 30, 2002, through November 15, 2006, at Queen's University. Participants were randomized to 1 of the following 4 groups for 6 months: resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, resistance and aerobic exercise (combined exercise), or nonexercise control. Primary outcomes were analyzed by an intent-to-treat model and included changes in insulin resistance by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and functional limitation using the average change in 4 tests combined (average z score). RESULTS: After controlling for age, sex, and baseline value, insulin resistance improved compared with controls in the aerobic exercise and the combined exercise groups but not in the resistance exercise group. Improvement (mean [SE]) in the combined exercise group was greater than in the resistance exercise group (9.2 [1.3] vs 1.8 [1.3] mg/mL/microIU per kilogram of skeletal muscle per minute x100 [P < .001]) but not in the aerobic exercise group (9.2 [1.3] vs 6.5 [1.3] mg/mL/microIU per kilogram of skeletal muscle per minute x100 [P = .46]). Functional limitation improved significantly in all groups compared with the control group. Improvement in the combined exercise group was greater than in the aerobic exercise group (0.5 [0.1] vs -0.0 [0.1]; standard units, z score [P = .003]) but not in the resistance exercise group. Improvement in the resistance exercise group was not different from the aerobic exercise group. CONCLUSION: The combination of resistance and aerobic exercise was the optimal exercise strategy for simultaneous reduction in insulin resistance and functional limitation in previously sedentary, abdominally obese older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00520858.
机译:背景:当局主张抵抗和有氧运动减少至关重要慢性疾病和残疾的危险因素在老年人。结合的阻力和有氧运动相比之下,要么独自形态的风险因素通常是疾病和残疾未知的。久坐不动,腹部肥胖年长的男性和女性从2002年9月30日招募,通过2006年的11月15日,在皇后大学。参与者被随机分配到1的6个月后四组:阻力运动,有氧运动阻力结合有氧运动(锻炼),或做运动控制。分析了一个intent-to-treat模型和包括在内变化在胰岛素抵抗hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic夹和功能限制使用的平均变化4测试结合(平均z分数)。控制了年龄、性别、和基线值,胰岛素抵抗与改善控制在有氧运动和总和锻炼组而不是阻力运动组。锻炼组大于相结合抵抗运动组织(9.2 [1.3]vs 1.8 (1.3)毫克/毫升/每公斤microIU的骨骼肌分钟x100 [P <措施])但不是有氧运动组(9.2 [1.3]vs 6.5 (1.3)毫克/毫升/每公斤microIU的骨骼肌分钟x100 [P = .46])。在所有组相比明显改善与对照组。锻炼组大于相结合有氧运动组(0.5 [0.1]vs -0.0 (0.1);标准单位,z分数[P = .003])而不是抵抗运动组。抵抗运动组没有区别有氧运动组。阻力和有氧运动锻炼是最优策略同时减少胰岛素抵抗和在此前的久坐不动的功能限制,腹部肥胖的老年人。注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00520858。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号