首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Optimal level of oral anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of arterial thrombosis in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction: a prospective study of 4202 patients.
【24h】

Optimal level of oral anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of arterial thrombosis in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction: a prospective study of 4202 patients.

机译:口服抗凝治疗的理想境界预防动脉血栓形成的患者与机械心脏瓣膜假体,心房纤维性颤动,或心肌梗死:a4202名患者的前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant therapy is effective for the prevention of arterial thromboembolism in various patient groups. The increased risk of hemorrhage remains the major drawback to this therapy and is associated with the intensity of anticoagulation. Finding the optimal intensity at which the overall incidence rate of both bleeding and thromboembolic events is minimized represents a way to improve the safety of oral anticoagulant treatment. METHODS: We evaluated all patients visiting the Leiden Anticoagulation Clinic with mechanical heart valve prostheses, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction from 1994 to 1998. Untoward events were major thromboembolism and major hemorrhage. We calculated intensity-specific incidence rates of untoward events to assess the optimal intensity per indication of treatment. We enrolled 4202 patients for a total of 7788 patient-years. RESULTS: A total of 3226 hospital admissions were reported, 306 owing to an untoward event. Incidence rates of untoward events were around 4% per year for all indications: 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-5.6) for patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses, 4.3 (95% CI, 3.7-5.1) for patients with atrial fibrillation, and 3.6 per year (95% CI, 3.0-4.4) for patients treated after a myocardial infarction. The optimal intensity of anticoagulation for patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses was an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 to 2.9; for patients with atrial fibrillation, an INR of 3.0 to 3.4; and for patients after myocardial infarction, an INR of 3.5 to 3.9. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests target INRs of 3.0 for patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses and atrial fibrillation and 3.5 after myocardial infarction as a starting point in future clinical trials.
机译:背景:口服抗凝治疗有效的预防动脉各患者血栓栓塞组。增加出血的风险仍然是主要的这种疗法和缺点是相关联的抗凝治疗的强度。最优强度的总体发病率出血和血栓栓塞事件最小化代表一种改善吗口服抗凝治疗的安全。我们评估所有患者参观莱顿抗凝和机械心脏诊所瓣膜假体、心房纤颤或心肌梗死从1994年到1998年。事件是主要的血栓栓塞和专业出血。发病率评估的麻烦的事件最佳治疗强度/指示。7788年共招收了4202名病人白细胞数量。入学报道,306年由于一个麻烦的事件。事件是每年4%左右适应症:4.3(95%可信区间(CI),3.1 - -5.6)患者机械心脏瓣膜假体,4.3(95%可信区间,3.7 - -5.1)的病人心房纤颤,和3.6(95%每年CI, 3.0 - -4.4)后患者心肌梗塞。抗凝患者机械心脏瓣膜假体是一个国际2.5到2.9的标准化率(INR);房颤患者,INR的3.03.4;梗塞,3.5到3.9的印度卢比。研究表明目标inr 3.0病人与机械心脏瓣膜假体和心房心肌梗死后颤和3.5在未来的临床试验作为起点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号