...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.
【24h】

Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.

机译:治疗临床前医生访问局限性前列腺癌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The 2 primary therapeutic interventions for localized prostate cancer are delivered by different types of physicians, urologists, and radiation oncologists. We evaluated how visits to specialists and primary care physicians (PCPs) by men with localized prostate cancer are related to treatment choice. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, we identified 85 088 men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed at age 65 years or older, between 1994 and 2002. Men were categorized by primary treatment received within 9 months of diagnosis: radical prostatectomy (n = 18 201 [21%]), radiotherapy (n = 35 925 [42%]), androgen deprivation (n = 14 021 [17%]), or expectant management (n = 16 941 [20%]). Visits to specialists and PCPs were analyzed by patient characteristics and primary therapies received and were identified using Medicare claims and the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. RESULTS: Overall, 42 309 men (50%) were seen exclusively by urologists, 37 540 (44%) by urologists and radiation oncologists, 2329 (3%) by urologists and medical oncologists, and 2910 (3%) by all 3 specialists. There was a strong association between the type of specialist seen and primary therapy received. Visits to PCPs were infrequent between diagnosis and receipt of therapy (22% of patients visited any PCP and 17% visited an established PCP) and were not associated with a greater likelihood of specialist visits. Irrespective of age, comorbidity status, or specialist visits, men seen by PCPs were more likely to be treated expectantly. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist visits relate strongly to prostate cancer treatment choices. In light of these findings, prior evidence that specialists prefer the modality they themselves deliver and the lack of conclusive comparative studies demonstrating superiority of one modality over another, it is essential to ensure that men have access to balanced information before choosing a particular therapy for prostate cancer.
机译:背景:2主要治疗干预措施的局限性前列腺癌由不同类型的医生,泌尿科医师、放射肿瘤学家。评估如何访问专家和主由男性保健医生(pcp)与本地化前列腺癌治疗相关的选择。方法:使用监测、流行病学、和最终结果(SEER)医疗保险相关数据库,我们确定了与临床85 088人局限性前列腺癌的诊断,享年65岁年或以上,在1994年和2002年之间。分类的主要治疗内收到9个月的诊断:根治性前列腺切除术(n =18 201[21%]),放疗(n = 35 925 [42%]),雄激素剥夺(n = 14 021[17%]),或准管理(n = 16 941[20%])。分析了专家和pcp的病人特点和主要的治疗方法使用医疗保险索赔和标识美国医学协会的医生Masterfile。被认为完全是由泌尿科医生,37 540 (44%)泌尿科医师和放射肿瘤学家,2329年由泌尿科医师和医疗肿瘤学家(3%),2910例(3%),3专家。强类型的专家之间的联系看到和初级治疗。罕见的诊断与收到吗治疗(22%的病人访问任何卡式肺囊虫肺炎和17%参观了一个卡式肺囊虫肺炎)和没有建立更大的可能性专家访问。疾病状态或专家互访,男性被pcp更容易治疗期待着什么。与前列腺癌治疗的强烈选择。证据表明,专家喜欢形态他们交付和缺乏结论性的比较研究证明优越的形态,它是确保个人获得的关键平衡在选择一个特定的信息治疗前列腺癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号