首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Standard care impact on effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Standard care impact on effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机译:标准治疗影响高度活跃的影响抗逆转录病毒疗法的依从性的干预措施:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to medication limits the effectiveness of treatment for human immunodeficiency virus. Systematic reviews can identify practical and effective interventions. Meta-analyses that control for variability in standard care provided to control groups may produce more accurate estimates of intervention effects. METHODS: To examine whether viral load and adherence success rates could be accurately explained by the active content of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) adherence interventions when controlling for variability in care delivered to controls, databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of HAART adherence interventions published from 1996 to January 2009. A total of 1342 records were retrieved, and 52 articles were examined in detail. Directly observed therapy and interventions targeting specific patient groups (ie, psychiatric or addicted patients, patients <18 years) were excluded, yielding a final sample of 31 trials. Two coders independently retrieved study details. Authors were contacted to complete missing data. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in the analyses. The content of adherence care provided to control and intervention groups predicted viral load and adherence success rates in both conditions (P < .001 for all comparisons), with an estimated impact of optimal adherence care of 55 percentage points. After controlling for variability in care provided to controls, the capacity of the interventions accurately predicted viral load and adherence effect sizes (R(2) = 0.78, P = .02; R(2) = 0.28, P < .01). Although interventions were generally beneficial, their effectiveness reduced noticeably with increasing levels of standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention and control patients were exposed to effective adherence care. Future meta-analyses of (behavior change) interventions should control for variability in care delivered to active controls. Clinical practice may be best served by implementing current best practice.
机译:背景:可怜的坚持药物治疗的限制人类治疗的有效性免疫缺陷病毒。识别实用和有效的干预措施。荟萃分析,控制变化标准治疗对照组可能提供产生更精确的估计的干预效果。和坚持成功率可以准确解释为高度活跃的活动内容抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)治疗的依从性干预措施控制变化护理送到控制、数据库搜索的随机对照试验鸡尾酒疗法的依从性的干预措施从1996年出版2009年1月。检索,52文章被检查细节。干预措施针对特定病人组(精神或成瘾病人,病人< 18年)被排除在外,最后一个样本31日的试验。研究细节。缺失的数据。包括在分析中。坚持控制和提供护理预测病毒载量和干预组坚持在两种条件下的成功率(P <措施的比较),估计最佳坚持照顾55比例的影响点。提供给控制的能力干预措施准确预测病毒载量和依从性的影响大小(R (2) = 0.78, P = .02点;R (2) = 0.28, P < . 01)。通常是有益的,它们的有效性水平提高的显著降低标准治疗。控制患者有效坚持治疗。改变)的干预措施应该控制变化保健交付给主动控制。临床实践可能最好的服务实现当前的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号