【24h】

Authors reply

机译:作者回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We want to thank Larson et al. for their very astute comments, with which we agree on nearly every point. We are pleased that this research has stirred productive academic dialogue. This is indeed an interesting topic that has evolved significantly in the past few years, and we hope that our responses may contribute to a continued conversation and lead to further study. The first point addresses the study design, which was a matched-pair cohort comparison. We certainly debated between this design and the design Larson et al. suggest, which would compare all surgical hip dislocation (SHD) patients to all patients in the much larger arthroscopy group. Ultimately, our statisticians carried the day, and we heeded their recommendation that a matched-pair comparison is a more statistically powerful design. However, having heard the readers' perspective that it would be more valid to include a large proportion of both groups, we will proceed in performing a follow-up study using the design suggested and will submit that study to Arthroscopy as well.
机译:我们想要感谢拉尔森等人的很精明的评论,我们几乎达成一致每一个点。引发了多产的学术对话。实际上已经演变的一个有趣的话题明显在过去的几年里,我们的希望我们可能导致持续的反应对话,导致进一步的研究。点解决了研究设计,这是一个匹配配对组比较。讨论这个设计和设计之间拉尔森等人建议,所有手术进行比较髋关节脱位(梅毒性心脏病)患者所有的病人更大的关节镜组。我们的统计学家把天,我们注意他们的建议匹配配对比较统计数据更为强大设计。的角度来看,它将更有效包括两组的很大一部分,我们将继续执行后续研究使用的设计建议,并将提交研究关节镜检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号