【24h】

Psychological distress in hip arthroscopy patients affects postoperative pain control

机译:臀部关节镜检查患者的心理压力影响术后疼痛控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine whether patients with higher levels of preoperative psychological distress more frequently use a postoperative fascia iliaca nerve block for pain control after hip arthroscopy, and to determine whether a fascia iliaca nerve block is an effective adjunct to multimodal oral and intravenous analgesia after hip arthroscopy. Methods: One hundred seven patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were prospectively enrolled. Before surgery, patients were administered the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire to quantify their level of preoperative psychological distress. Postoperatively, patients with pain inadequately controlled by multimodal oral and intravenous analgesics could request and receive a fascia iliaca nerve block. Pain scores, opioid consumption, time in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and postoperative complications were recorded for all patients. Results: Patients with normal Distress Risk Assessment Method scores requested fascia iliaca nerve blocks approximately half as frequently (18 of 50 [36%]) as patients in the at-risk category (28 of 47 [60%]) or distressed category (7 of 10 [70%]) (P =.02). Patients with high levels of distress also received 40% more intraoperative opioid than patients with normal scores (P =.04). In the study population as a whole, patients who received a fascia iliaca nerve block (n = 53) had a higher initial visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in the PACU (7.2 ± 0.3 v 5.5 ± 0.4, P =.001) and showed greater improvement in the VAS pain score by PACU discharge (-4.3 ± 0.2 v -2.1 ± 0.3, P ≤.0001) compared with patients who did not receive a block (n = 54). Conclusions: Patients with higher levels of preoperative psychological distress more frequently requested a postoperative nerve block to achieve adequate pain control after hip arthroscopy. Patients receiving a block had greater improvement in VAS pain scores compared with patients managed with oral and intravenous analgesics alone. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
机译:目的:确定患者高术前心理压力水平更频繁地使用术后筋臀部后神经阻滞疼痛控制关节镜检查,以确定是否一个筋膜iliaca神经阻滞是一种有效的附属物多通道后口服给药和静脉注射镇痛臀部关节镜检查。病人接受髋关节关节镜检查前瞻性的。管理困境的风险评估方法问卷调查量化的程度术前心理压力。术后,患者疼痛不充分控制的多通道口服给药和静脉注射止痛剂可以请求和接收一个筋膜iliaca神经阻滞。消费,在麻醉护理单位(PACU)和术后并发症记录所有患者。分数正常压力的风险评估方法请求的筋神经阻滞大约有一半经常(18 50 [36%])因为患者的高危类别(28 47岁[60%])或不良类别(7 10 [70%])(P= .02点)。收到了术中阿片类药物超过40%正常的患者得分(P = .04点)。研究人口作为一个整体,病人收到了筋神经阻滞(n = 53)更高的最初视觉模拟量表(血管)疼痛在PACU的得分(7.2±0.3 v 5.5±0.4,P=措施)和血管显示更大的改善疼痛评分PACU放电(-4.3±0.2±-2.1 v0.3, P≤。)相比,患者没有收到一块(n = 54)。水平较高的术前心理痛苦更频繁地要求术后神经阻滞达到足够了臀部关节镜后疼痛控制。收到一块有更明显的血管疼痛分数与患者管理口服给药和静脉注射止痛剂。证据:ⅳ级、病例系列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号