首页> 外文期刊>Archives of internal medicine. >Evaluation of consumer medication information dispensed in retail pharmacies.
【24h】

Evaluation of consumer medication information dispensed in retail pharmacies.

机译:消费者评价药物的信息在零售药店。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: United States retail pharmacies are key sources of written consumer medication information (CMI) through leaflets dispensed with prescription drugs. The content and format of this CMI are unregulated. Public Law 104-180 stipulates that by 2006, 95% of prescriptions be accompanied by "useful" CMI. METHODS: Professional shoppers filled prescriptions for lisinopril and metformin in a national sample of 365 pharmacies. Dispensed CMI was evaluated according to explicit criteria (77 for lisinopril and 78 for metformin) adapted from Food and Drug Administration guidelines. RESULTS: Six percent of pharmacies did not provide any written CMI. A mean (SD) of 60.2% (20.7%) and 57.7% (20.1%) of the criteria for useful CMI were met for lisinopril and metformin prescriptions, respectively. Shortcomings concerned especially "directions about use" with means of 53.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.4%-56.5%) and 45.6% (43.7%-47.6%), and comprehensibility/legibility, (41.1%-43.7%) for lisinopril and metformin, respectively. The CMI leaflets ranged from 33 to 2482 words, with more than 1000-word differences among those meeting higher than 80% of the content criteria, suggesting large variations in conciseness. Chain pharmacies had better adherence to content criteria than did independent stores, with mean differences of 22.1% (95% CI, 15.8%-28.4%) for lisinopril and 21.1% (95% CI, 14.9%-27.3%) for metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Although distribution through pharmacies seems effective, the content, format, reading level, and excessive length of CMI are disconcerting. Private sector initiatives to provide useful CMI have failed. Research is needed on effective information selection and presentation in terms of effects on comprehension, retention, and appropriate patient actions to derive optimal drug benefit.
机译:背景:美国零售药店写消费者药物的主要来源信息(CMI)通过传单分发处方药。这CMI是规范的。规定,到2006年,95%的处方伴随着“有用”CMI。专业的购物者处方赖诺普利和二甲双胍在国家的样本365个药店。根据明确的标准(77年赖诺普利和78年二甲双胍)改编自食品和药物政府的指导方针。药房没有提供任何书面CMI。意味着(SD)的60.2%(20.7%)和57.7% (20.1%)有用的CMI的标准得到满足赖诺普利和二甲双胍处方,分别。“使用”的方向(95%的53.4%可信区间(CI), 51.4% - -56.5%)和45.6%(43.7% - -47.6%)和可理解性/易读性,赖诺普利和二甲双胍(41.1% - -43.7%),分别。2482字,1000多字的差异高于80%的那些会议内容标准,表明大的变化简洁性。坚持比内容标准独立书店,意思是不同的22.1%(95%可信区间,15.8% - -28.4%)赖诺普利和21.1%(95%可信区间,14.9% - -27.3%)二甲双胍。结论:尽管分布药店似乎有效,内容,格式,阅读水平,和过度CMI的长度令人不安。提供有用的CMI已经失败。需要选择和有效的信息表达的影响理解、保留和适当的病人行动获得最佳的药物福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号