首页> 外文期刊>Archives of internal medicine. >The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of asthma in adults: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of asthma in adults: a meta-analysis.

机译:质子泵抑制剂的功效的治疗成人哮喘:一个荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease occurs frequently among patients with asthma. Therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to improve asthma control remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of PPIs in treatment of asthma using objective and subjective outcome measures. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using MEDLINE (1950-January 2010), PubMed (1950-January 2010), EMBASE (1980-January 2010), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through January 31, 2010). Randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of PPIs for treatment of asthma in adults were selected. The primary outcome of interest was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate. Secondary outcomes included objective (evening PEF rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second) and subjective (asthma symptoms score and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score) measures. Influence of study characteristics on outcomes was examined by subgroup analyses and meta-regression. RESULTS: Eleven trials (2524 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, patients had a higher mean morning PEF rate after treatment with PPIs compared with placebo (mean difference, 8.68 L/min [95% confidence interval, 2.35-15.02]). No significant single large-study effect, temporal effect, or publication bias was seen. Subgroup analysis revealed a trend toward a larger improvement in morning PEF rate in studies enrolling only patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (mean difference, 16.90 L/min [95% confidence interval, 0.85-32.95]). Analyses of secondary outcomes (asthma symptoms score, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, evening PEF rate, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second) showed no significant difference between PPIs and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitor therapy in adults with asthma results in a small, statistically significant improvement in morning PEF rate. The magnitude of this improvement, however, is unlikely to be of meaningful clinical significance. There is insufficient evidence to recommend empirical use of PPIs for routine treatment of asthma.
机译:背景:胃食管返流疾病发生经常在哮喘患者。与质子泵抑制剂(ppi)改善哮喘控制仍存在争议。对质子泵抑制剂治疗的疗效进行评估哮喘使用客观的和主观的结果措施。应用MEDLINE(1950 - 2010年1月),PubMed(1950 - 2010年1月),EMBASE (1980 - 12010)和Cochrane中心注册的对照试验(到2010年1月31日)。随机、安慰剂对照试验评估质子泵抑制剂治疗哮喘的疗效成人被选中。兴趣是早晨峰呼气流量(PEF)率。(晚上PEF和用力呼气量1秒)和主观(哮喘症状评分和哮喘生活质量问卷得分)措施。结果被亚组分析和检查多元回归。患者符合入选标准。患者有较高的意思是清晨PEF率质子泵抑制剂治疗与安慰剂比较(的意思差异,8.68升/分钟(95%置信区间,2.35 - -15.02])。效应、时间效应、或发表偏倚观察。更大的改进在清晨PEF率的研究只招收患者胃食管返流性疾病(平均差,16.90 L / min (95%置信区间,0.85 - -32.95])。二次结果(哮喘症状评分、哮喘晚上的生活质量问卷得分,PEF率,并在1秒用力呼气量)质子泵抑制剂和显示没有明显的区别安慰剂。治疗成人哮喘的结果在一个小,统计上显著的改善PEF率。然而,不太可能有意义的临床的意义。推荐经验使用质子泵抑制剂的例程治疗哮喘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号