...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Utilization and Costs of Postoperative Physical Therapy After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparison of Privately Insured and Medicare Patients
【24h】

Utilization and Costs of Postoperative Physical Therapy After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparison of Privately Insured and Medicare Patients

机译:术后身体的利用率和成本治疗肩袖修复后:一个比较私人保险和医疗保险的病人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the utilization and charges related to physical therapy (PT) after rotator cuff repair in privately insured and Medicare patients and between arthroscopic and open/mini-open repair techniques. Methods: The PearlDiver insurance database was queried for patients receiving postoperative PT using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Data were available from 2007 to 2011 for United Healthcare and from 2005 to 2011 for Medicare patients. Patients undergoing arthroscopic (CPT 29827) or open/mini-open approaches (CPT 23410, 23412, 23420) were identified in both populations. Utilization was determined by both the percentage of patients with at least one postoperative PT-related code and the average number of encounters per patient. Per-patient average charge was determined by dividing total charges within the billing period by the patient total. Results: A total of 365,891 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were identified. There was an increase in the number of arthroscopic repairs (+29.1%, P = .027, United Healthcare; +78.9%, P < .001, Medicare) and a decrease in the number of open/mini-open repairs (-18.2%, P = .038, UnitedHealthcare; -18.2%, P < .001, Medicare) across the study period. At 6-months postoperatively, PT utilization was greater in the United Healthcare groups (82.9% arthroscopic, 81.0% open/mini-open) than in the Medicare groups (41.8% arthroscopic, 43.2% open/miniopen). Utilization-weighted per-patient average chargewas comparable among all 4 groups, with slightly higher charges in the United Healthcare groups ($3,376 arthroscopic, $3,251 open/mini-open) compared with the Medicare groups ($2,940 arthroscopic, $2,807 open/mini-open). The United Healthcare groups had a greater number of utilization-weighted billed encounters (36.1 for open/mini-open, 9.5 for arthroscopic) than their Medicare counterparts (12.8 open/mini-open, 16.7 arthroscopic). Conclusions: Utilization of PT after rotator cuff repair is substantially higher in privately insured than in Medicare patients. Utilization rates appear to be comparable between surgical approaches. Per-patient costs were comparable irrespective of surgical approach and insurance modality.
机译:目的:评价利用率和指控旋转后相关物理治疗(PT)袖口修复在私人保险和医疗保险病人和关节镜之间打开/金永林修复技术。PearlDiver保险数据库查询患者术后使用当前PT程序上的术语规范。从2007年到2011年为曼联医疗和2005年到2011年医疗保险的病人。29827年接受关节镜(CPT)或打开/金永林方法(CPT 23410、23412、人口23420)被确定。利用由两个比例决定至少一个术后患者PT-related代码和的平均数每个病人接触。负责确定除以总费用计费周期内的病人。结果:共有365891名患者接受肩袖修复被确定。越来越多的关节镜维修(+ 29.1%, P = .027,美国医疗保健;措施、医疗保险)和数量的减少打开/金永林维修(-18.2%,P = .038UnitedHealthcare;在整个研究期间。术后,PT利用率更大美国医疗保健组织(82.9%关节镜,打开/金永林81.0%)比医疗保险组织打开/ miniopen关节镜(41.8%,43.2%)。Utilization-weighted平均平均chargewas可比在所有4组略高的费用在美国医疗保健关节镜组(3376美元,3251美元打开/金永林)与医疗保险组织打开/金永林关节镜(2940美元,2807美元)。美国医疗保健集团有更多的utilization-weighted宣传遇到(36.19.5打开/金永林,关节镜)比他们的医疗保险同行(12.8打开/金永林,16.7关节镜)。肩袖修复后就会大大增加在私人保险医疗保险的病人。产能利用率之间的可比性手术方法。可比无论和手术方法保险模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号