首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results Between Partial Meniscectomy and Refixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
【24h】

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results Between Partial Meniscectomy and Refixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

机译:比较的临床和影像学结果之间的部分半月板切除术和重新装设内侧半月板后根的眼泪:最低5年随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiologic results of partial meniscectomy with those of refixation in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods: Between 2005 and 2009, patients with MMPRTs who had been followed up for at least 5 years after a partial meniscectomy (group M, n = 20) or pullout repair (group R, n = 37) were recruited. The mean follow-up duration was 67.5 months in group M and 72.0 months in group R. Clinical assessments, including the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form score, and radiographic assessments, including the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade and medial joint space width, were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. We compared the preoperative results with the final results in each group, and we compared the final results of groups M and R. Five-year survival rates were also evaluated. Results: The mean Lysholm score (P = .039) and IKDC score (P = .037) improved significantly. However, the width of the medial joint space (P < .001) and K-L grade (P < .001) worsened significantly in both groups. When we compared the final results, group R had significantly better Lysholm scores (P = .002) and IKDC scores (P < .001) than group M. Group R showed less K-L grade progression (P = .005) and less medial joint space narrowing (P < .001) than group M. The rate of conversion to total knee arthroplasty was 35% in group M, whereas there was no conversion to total knee arthroplasty in group R. The 5-year survival rates in groups M and R were 75% and 100%, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions: For MMPRTs, refixation was more effective than partial meniscectomy in terms of the clinical and radiologic outcomes and survival for at least 5 years' follow-up. Refixation slowed the progression of arthritic changes compared with partial meniscectomy, although it did not prevent the progression of arthrosis completely.
机译:目的:比较临床和放射部分半月板切除术与的结果重新装设在内侧半月板患者后根的眼泪(MMPRTs)至少5年随访。MMPRTs患者随访了至少部分半月板切除术后5年(集团M, n = 20)或撤离修理(R组,n =37)招募了。M组为67.5个月和72.0个月吗组r .临床评估,包括Lysholm评分和国际膝盖文档委员会(IKDC)主观的膝盖分数形式,和影像学评估,包括Kellgren-Lawrence K-L品位和内侧关节间隙宽度,进行评估术前在最后的随访。比较术前与最终结果每组结果,我们比较了决赛组织M和r . 5年生存的结果利率也被评估。Lysholm得分(P = .039)和IKDC得分(P =.037)显著改善。的内侧关节空间(P <措施)和K-L年级(P <措施)大幅恶化组。R明显更好Lysholm得分(P =.002)和IKDC分数比M组(P <措施)。组R显示更少K-L年级进步(P =.005)和内侧关节空间缩小(P <措施)比组m .转换的速度全膝关节置换术M组为35%,而没有转化为全膝关节关节成形术在r组5年生存率在组织M和R分别为75%和100%,(分别P <措施)。再设立比部分更有效半月板切除术的临床和放射结果和生存至少5年的随访。关节炎的进展而变化部分半月板切除术,尽管它并没有阻止关节完全的发展。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号