首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Geometry, Using InVivo 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography, During Transportal and Outside-In Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
【24h】

Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Geometry, Using InVivo 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography, During Transportal and Outside-In Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

机译:比较股骨隧道几何,使用比起现场三维计算机断层扫描,期间Transportal和由外向内的单包前交叉韧带重建技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques regarding femoral tunnel position and geometry after anatomic single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: This study included 51 patients who underwent anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with the TP (n = 21) or OI (n = 30) technique. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography 3 days after the operation. The femoral tunnel position (quadrant method), femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were assessed by immediate postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography with OsiriX imaging software. Results: The OI technique had a shallower femoral tunnel position (arthroscopic position) than did the TP technique (P = .005). The mean femoral graft bending angle was significantly more acute with the OI technique (101.3 degrees +/- 8.2 degrees) than with the TP technique (107.9 degrees +/- 10.0 degrees) (P = .02). The mean femoral tunnel length was significantly greater with the OI technique (33.0 +/- 3.5 mm) than with the TP technique (29.6 +/- 3.9 mm) (P = .003). Posterior wall breakage occurred in 7 cases (33.3%) with the TP technique and 1 case (3.3%) with the OI technique (P = .02). Conclusions: The mean femoral tunnel position was significantly shallower (arthroscopic position) with the OI technique than with the TP technique. The OI technique resulted in a more acute femoral graft bending angle, longer femoral tunnel length, and lower incidence of posterior wall breakage than did the TP technique. These results might be helpful for anatomic SB ACL reconstruction using TP and OI techniques.
机译:目的:比较transportal (TP)和关于股由外向内(OI)技术解剖后隧道的位置和几何单包(某人)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建。包括51病人解剖ACL重建与TP (n = 21)或OI (n= 30)技术。三维计算机断层扫描后3天操作。(象限方法),股贪污弯曲角度,股骨隧道长度、后壁破损被立即术后评估与OsiriX三维计算机断层扫描成像软件。浅股骨隧道定位(关节镜位置)比TP (P = .005)技术。平均股贪污弯曲角更严重的OI技术(101.3度+ / - 8.2度)比TP技术(107.9度+ / - 10.0度)(P =02)。OI技术(33.0大大增强+ / - 3.5毫米)比TP技术(29.6 + / -3.9毫米)(P = .003)。发生在7例(33.3%)与TP技术和1例(3.3%)与OI方法(P =02)。位置明显浅(关节镜位置)OI技术比TP技术。导致更严重的股贪污弯曲长角,股骨隧道长度和低后壁破裂的发生率比TP的技术。解剖某人ACL重建使用TP和OI技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号