首页> 外文期刊>Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity >Rejecting Equality: Psychological Differences Between Australian Sexual Minority Men Voting “Yes,,,Voting “No,'or Abstaining From Voting on the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage
【24h】

Rejecting Equality: Psychological Differences Between Australian Sexual Minority Men Voting “Yes,,,Voting “No,'or Abstaining From Voting on the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage

机译:拒绝平等:心理差异澳大利亚性少数男人之间投票“是……投票“不是”,或者从投票弃权同性婚姻的合法化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2017,Australians voted on the legalization of same-sex marriage. Whereas most sexual minority individuals voted in support of same-sex marriage ("Yes"), some abstained from voting, and a small minority voted against same-sex marriage ("No"). The present study examined the psychological differences between these three groups in a sample of sexual minority men (N = 1,005). Participants completed a survey assessing their vote in the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey along with their internalized homonegativity, religiosity, political orientation, gay identification, and perceived discrimination. Results indicated that, relative to "Yes" voters, those who abstained from voting or voted "No" were higher in internalized homonegativity, higher in religiosity, more politically conservative, lower in gay identification, and perceived less discrimination. Implications of these results are discussed.
机译:2017年,澳大利亚人投票的合法化同性婚姻。个人投票支持同性婚姻(“是”),弃权投票,一个小少数民族投票反对同性婚姻(“不”)。目前的研究调查了心理这些三组之间的差异男性性少数的样品(N = 1005)。参与者完成了调查评估他们在澳大利亚婚姻法邮政投票调查连同他们的内化homonegativity,宗教信仰、政治方向、同性恋识别和感知到的歧视。结果表明,相对于“是”选民,那些放弃了投票或投票“不”在内化homonegativity更高,在宗教信仰,更多的政治保守,在同性恋身份低,认为更少的歧视。这些研究结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号