首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Prevalence of Lateral Meniscal Extrusion for Posterior Lateral Meniscal Root Lesion With and Without Concomitant Midbody Radial Tear in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
【24h】

Prevalence of Lateral Meniscal Extrusion for Posterior Lateral Meniscal Root Lesion With and Without Concomitant Midbody Radial Tear in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

机译:流行的外侧半月板挤压后外侧半月板损伤和根源没有伴随中体径向撕裂前交叉韧带损伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of lateral meniscal extrusion for patients with posterior lateral meniscal root lesions (PLMRLs) and for those with concomitant midbody radial tears (MRTs) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Methods: A database of consecutive patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between 2011 and 2013 was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with isolated ACL injuries and those with associated PLMRLs. Patients with (1) unavailable preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans, (2) other concomitant ligamentous injuries, (3) severe degeneration or malalignment, (4) infection or tumor, or (5) history of surgery on the injured side were excluded. For patients with associated PLMRLs (study group), degree of concomitant MRTs and status of meniscofemoral ligaments (MFLs) were verified arthroscopically. Prevalence of lateral meniscal extrusion was compared between (1) patients in the study group and those with isolated ACL injuries and between (2) those with and without concomitant MRTs in the study group. Results: Of the 1,021 consecutive patients, 412 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 52 (5.1%) had an associated PLMRL (study group) and another 52 were randomly chosen from the 360 isolated ACL injuries as the control group. In the study group, 33 (63.5%) were arthroscopically verified to have concomitant MRTs. Prevalence of lateral meniscal extrusion was significantly higher (P < .0001) in the study group (30.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.3 to 43.3) than in the control group (1.9%; 95% CI, -1.8 to 5.6), whereas there was no significant difference (P = .758) between patients with (33.3%; 95% CI, 17.3 to 49.3) and without (26.3%; 95% CI, 6.5 to 46.1) concomitant MRTs in the study group. However, the 7 patients who showed either complete concomitant MRTs or absence of MFLs were all diagnosed to have lateral meniscal extrusion. Conclusions: The PLMRLs, identified in 5.1% of ACL injuries, appeared to result in lateral meniscal extrusion. Although the presence of a concomitant MRT did not further increase the prevalence of lateral meniscal extrusion in the setting of a PLMRL, surgical repair might still be necessary if a complete concomitant MRT or an absence of MFL was identified to restore normal meniscal functions. Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic case-control study.
机译:目的:探讨侧的患病率半月板挤压后患者外侧半月板损伤(PLMRLs)和根源那些伴随中体径向的泪水(重置)在前交叉韧带(ACL)受伤。患者主要ACL重建在2011年和2013年之间是回顾性的综述了识别患者孤立的ACL伤害和那些PLMRLs有关。(1)不可用术前患者磁共振成像扫描,(2)伴随的韧带的损伤,(3)严重变性或错乱排列,(4)感染或肿瘤,手术或(5)历史上受伤被排除在外。PLMRLs(研究小组),伴随越江的程度和地位的meniscofemoral韧带(漏)arthroscopically验证。外侧半月板挤压之间的比较(1)研究小组和病人孤立的ACL损伤和(2)之间没有伴随越江的学习小组。结果:连续的1021名患者中,412年符合纳入和排除标准。那些,52例(5.1%)有相关PLMRL(研究组),另一个52是随机选择的360年的孤立的ACL损伤的控制组。arthroscopically验证相伴重置。高(P <。)在这项研究组(30.8%;43.3)高于对照组(1.9%;-1.8到5.6),而没有意义患者之间的差别(P = .758)(33.3%;95%可信区间,6.5至46.1)相伴的重置学习小组。完成相伴重置或缺乏漏磁场都诊断外侧半月板挤压。ACL损伤的5.1%,似乎导致外侧半月板挤压。伴随的捷运没有进一步增加外侧半月板挤压的患病率设置PLMRL,手术修复可能仍然是必要的,如果一个完整的捷运或一个没有漏磁场被恢复正常半月板的功能。预后病例对照研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号