...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: Ipsilateral Quadriceps Versus Contralateral Semitendinosus-Gracilis Autografts
【24h】

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: Ipsilateral Quadriceps Versus Contralateral Semitendinosus-Gracilis Autografts

机译:前交叉韧带手术修正:身体的同侧的股四头肌和侧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the subjective outcomes, knee stability, and donor-site morbidity after revision ACL reconstruction using either autologous ipsilateral quadriceps tendon or contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis tendon. Methods: A sample size calculation suggested that we needed 25 patients in each group to detect equality between both groups. Therefore, we evaluated 30 consecutive patients who underwent an ACL revision surgery with ipsilateral boneequadriceps tendon grafts and 30 consecutive patients with the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis grafts between January 2010 and December 2012. Because of follow-up and exclusion criteria, finally 51 patients were evaluated. All patients were followed prospectively for at least 2 years with KT1000 arthrometer testing and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective grading. At the 24-month follow-up, additional clinical scores were evaluated: the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm score, assessing pain during kneeling, and anterior knee pain. Results: The KT1000 postoperative arthrometer side-to-side difference was 2.0 +/- 1.2 mm for the quadriceps group and 3.0 +/- 2.9 mm for the semitendinosus-gracilis group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .461). There was also no difference in the rate of positive pivot-shift tests between groups (P = .661). The Lysholm score was 82.5 +/- 18 in the quadriceps group and 73.8 +/- 19 in the semitendinosus-gracilis group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .060). There was also no significant difference in the single KOOS subscores, assessing pain while kneeling and anterior knee pain (included in the KOOS score). No rerupture occurred during follow-up. Conclusions: Revision ACL reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon graft showed clinical outcomes similar to those of the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis graft in terms of knee stability and function. Thus, the bone-quadriceps tendon graft may be a good alternative to the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft for revision ACL reconstruction.
机译:目的:评价主观结果,膝盖稳定,施主能级发病率修改ACL重建使用自体侧股四头肌肌腱或侧semitendinosus-gracilis肌腱。方法:样本大小计算建议我们需要检测每组25例两组之间的平等。评估连续30个病人ACL修订手术侧boneequadriceps肌腱移植和连续30患者的侧semitendinosus-gracilis移植1月之间2010年和2012年12月。排除标准,最后51例评估。前瞻性与KT1000至少2年arthrometer测试和国际膝盖文档委员会(IKDC)客观评分。在24个月的随访,额外的临床分数评估:膝盖受伤骨关节炎评分结果(三星),Lysholm分数,评估疼痛在跪着,前膝盖疼痛。术后arthrometer左右的区别是2.0 + / - 1.2毫米的股四头肌组和吗semitendinosus-gracilis 3.0 + / - 2.9毫米组。显著(P = .461)。积极pivot-shift速度的差异测试组(P = .661)之间。得分是82.5 + / - 18股四头肌群和73.8 + / - 19 semitendinosus-gracilis组。差别无统计学意义(P = .060)。不同单一三星部分的得分,评估疼痛而跪着和前膝盖疼痛(包括在辜氏家族评分)。随访期间发生。ACL使用股四头肌肌腱重建贪污显示类似的临床结果的侧semitendinosus-gracilis贪污的膝盖稳定和功能。因此,bone-quadriceps肌腱移植可能是一个对侧的不错的选择semitendinosus-gracilis肌腱移植物进行修订ACL重建。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号