...
【24h】

Comment on Hoffman et al.

机译:霍夫曼等人发表评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dear Editors:In "Beyond Dose Assessment: Using Risk With Full Disclosure Of Uncertainty in Public And Scientific Communication," Hoffman et al. (2011) strongly argue for using quantitative measures of risk with uncertainty, rather than dose, as a means to better communicate the impact on human health from radiation exposure. The authors note that currently, we focus on "annual dose, without explicitly [emphasis added] evaluating the health risk associated with those exposures, principally the risk of radiation-induced cancer." The word explicitly is defined as "fully and clearly expressed or demonstrated; leaving nothing merely implied; clearly developed or formulated." I would argue that an expression of quantitative risk of stochastic disease from relatively low doses of radiation is anything but explicit.
机译:亲爱的编辑:“除了剂量评估:使用充分披露的不确定性风险公众和科学交流,”霍夫曼等艾尔。(2011)强烈主张使用定量风险与不确定性的措施,而不是剂量,来更好的沟通的影响从辐射对人类健康。作者指出,目前,我们关注的是“年度[粗体字另加]剂量,没有明确评估与相关的健康风险曝光,主要的风险辐射诱导癌症。”定义为“充分和明确表示证明;明确开发或制定。”一个表达式定量的风险随机从相对较低的剂量的疾病辐射是显式的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号