首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >All-Epiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Drilling: Avoiding Injury to the Physis, Lateral Collateral Ligament, Anterolateral Ligament, and Popliteusd - A 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Study
【24h】

All-Epiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Drilling: Avoiding Injury to the Physis, Lateral Collateral Ligament, Anterolateral Ligament, and Popliteusd - A 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Study

机译:All-Epiphyseal前交叉韧带股骨弗西斯隧道钻孔:避免受伤,侧侧韧带,前外侧的韧带,Popliteusd——三维计算机断层扫描研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the relation of the at-risk structures (distal femoral physis, lateral collateral ligament, anterolateral ligament, popliteus, and articular cartilage) during all-epiphyseal femoral tunnel drilling. A second purpose was 2-fold: (1) to develop recommendations for tunnel placement and orientation that anatomically reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) while minimizing the risk of injury to these at-risk structures, and (2) to allow for maximal tunnel length to increase the amount of graft in the socket to facilitate healing. Methods: Three-dimensional models of 6 skeletally immature knees (aged 711 years) were reconstructed from computed tomography and used to simulate all-epiphyseal femoral tunnels. Tunnels began within the ACL footprint and were directed laterally or anterolaterally, with the goal of avoiding injury to at-risk structures. The spatial relation between the ideal tunnel and these structures was evaluated. Full-length tunnels and partial length condyle sockets were simulated in the models using the same trajectories. Results: An anterolateral tunnel could be placed to avoid direct injury to lateral structures. The safe zone on the anterolateral aspect of the femur was larger than that of a tunnel with a direct lateral trajectory (median 127 mm(2) vs 83 mm(2), P = .028). Anterolateral tunnels were longer than direct lateral tunnels (median 30 mm vs 24 mm, P = .041). Safe angles for anterolateral tunnels were 34 degrees to 40 degrees from the posterior condylar axis; direct lateral tunnels were drilled 4 degrees to 9 degrees from the posterior condylar axis. Sockets could be placed without direct injury to structures at risk with either orientation. Conclusions: An all-epiphyseal ACL femoral tunnel can be placed without causing direct injury to at-risk structures. A tunnel angled anterolaterally from the ACL origin is longer and has a larger safe zone compared with the direct lateral tunnel.
机译:目的:调查的关系高危结构(远端股骨弗西斯,侧侧韧带,前外侧的韧带、腘肌、关节软骨)在all-epiphyseal股骨隧道钻孔。第二个目的是2倍:(1)发展对隧道位置的建议解剖重建取向前交叉韧带(ACL)同时最小化受伤的风险,这些风险结构,和(2)允许最大隧道长度增加贪污的套接字促进愈合。模型6只是不成熟的膝盖(享年711岁从计算年)重建断层摄影术,用来模拟all-epiphyseal股骨隧道。足迹,横向或前外侧的,避免伤害的目标危险的结构。理想的隧道和这些结构之间评估。髁套接字模型模拟使用相同的轨迹。前外侧的隧道可以放置,以避免直接损伤横向结构。前区方面的股骨比直接的隧道横向轨迹(平均127毫米(2)vs 83毫米(2),P = .028)。直接横向隧道(30毫米vs 24毫米,中值P= .041)。从后34度到40度髁的轴;钻后4度到9度髁的轴。直接损伤结构与风险取向。没有造成股骨隧道可以放置直接损伤风险结构。成角的前外侧的ACL的起源长,相比有较大的安全区域直接横向隧道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号