首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >A randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression treated by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The ADAPT trial.
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression treated by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The ADAPT trial.

机译:认知的随机对照试验行为疗法与主要的青少年抑郁症治疗选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂。

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine if, in the short term, depressed adolescents attending routine NHS Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), and receiving ongoing active clinical care, treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) plus cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) compared with SSRI alone, results in better healthcare outcomes. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on depressed adolescents attending CAMHS who had not responded to a psychosocial brief initial intervention (BII) prior to randomisation. SETTING: Six English CAMHS participated in the study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 208 patients aged between 11 and 17 years were recruited and randomised. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received active routine clinical care in a CAMHS outpatient setting and an SSRI and half were offered CBT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The duration of the trial was a 12-week treatment phase, followed by a 16-week maintenance phase. Follow-up assessments were at 6, 12 and 28 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Secondary outcome measures were self-report depressive symptoms, interviewer-rated depressive signs and symptoms, interviewer-rated psychosocial impairment and clinical global impression of response to treatment. Information on resource use was collected in interview at baseline and at the 12- and 28-week follow-up assessments using the Child and Adolescent Service Use Schedule (CA-SUS). RESULTS: Of the 208 patients randomised, 200 (96%) completed the trial to the primary end-point at 12 weeks. By the 28-week follow-up, 174 (84%) participants were re-evaluated. Overall, 193 (93%) participants had been assessed at one or more time points. Clinical characteristics indicated that the trial was conducted on a severely depressed group. There was significant recovery at all time points in both arms. The findings demonstrated no difference in treatment effectiveness for SSRI + CBT over SSRI only for the primary or secondary outcome measures at any time point. This lack of difference held when baseline and treatment characteristics where taken into account (age, sex, severity, co-morbid characteristics, quality and quantity of CBT treatment, number of clinic attendances). The SSRI + CBT group was somewhat more expensive over the 28 weeks than the SSRI-only group (p=0.057) and no more cost-effective. Over the trial period there was on average a decrease in suicidal thoughts and self-harm compared with levels recorded at baseline. There was no significant increase in disinhibition, irritability and violence compared with levels at baseline. Around 20% (n=40) of patients in the trial were non-responders. Of these, 17 (43%) showed no improvement by 28 weeks and 23 (57%) were considered minimally (n=10) or moderately to severely worse (n=13). CONCLUSIONS: For moderately to severely depressed adolescents who are non-responsive to a BII, the addition of CBT to fluoxetine plus routine clinical care does not improve outcome or confer protective effects against adverse events and is not cost-effective. SSRIs (mostly fluoxetine) are not likely to result in harmful adverse effects. The findings are broadly consistent with existing guidelines on the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Modification is advised for those presenting with moderate (6-8 symptoms) to severe depressions (>8 symptoms) and in those with either overt suicidal risk and/or high levels of personal impairment. In such cases, the time allowed for response to psychosocial interventions should be no more than 2-4 weeks, after which fluoxetine should be prescribed. Further research should focus on evaluating the efficacy of specific psychological treatments against brief psychological intervention, determining the characteristics of patients with severe depression who are non-responsive to fluoxetine, relapse prevention in severe depression and improving tools
机译:目的:确定,在短期内,抑郁的青少年参加常规NHS的孩子和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS),临床护理和接收持续活跃,治疗选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂+认知行为单独疗法(CBT)与SSRI,结果更好的医疗效果。务实的随机对照试验(RCT)对抑郁的青少年参加社会心理CAMHS没有回应短暂的初始干预前(BII)随机。参与这项研究。208名患者的年龄在11岁至17年招募和随机。参与者收到了积极的常规临床在CAMHS保健门诊和五羟色胺再摄取抑制剂半是CBT。试验的持续时间是一个为期12周的治疗阶段,其次是16周维护阶段。后续评估在6、12和28周。主要结果测量指标是健康的国家尺度对孩子和结果青少年(HoNOSCA)。自我评定抑郁症状,interviewer-rated抑郁症状和体征,interviewer-rated心理障碍和临床对应对全球的印象治疗。在采访收集的基线和12 -28周后随访评估使用的孩子和青少年服务使用时间表(CA-SUS)。结果:208名患者随机的,200年(96%)完成了试验主在12周的端点。174例(84%)受试者重新评估。总的来说,193(93%)参与者被评估在一个或多个时间点。特征表明,试验进行一个严重抑郁症组。在所有时间点显著复苏吗双臂。SSRI +治疗效果的差异认知行为疗法在SSRI只有小学或中学在任何时间点的结果的措施。不同基线和治疗时举行特点,考虑(年龄,性、严重性、风险特征、质量的数量和CBT治疗,许多诊所上座率)。28周比更昂贵SSRI-only组(p = 0.057)成本效益。平均减少自杀的念头自残而记录水平基线。去抑制、易怒和暴力相比在基线水平。试验中患者无。这些,17例(43%)显示由28周没有改善和23个(57%)被认为是最低限度(n = 10)或中等至严重恶化(n = 13)。在中等至严重抑郁的青少年BII没有响应,是谁的CBT氟西汀+常规临床护理不能提高结果或提供保护作用对不良事件和不划算。选择性血清素再吸收抑制剂(主要是氟西汀)不太可能导致有害的副作用。一致准则吗治疗中度到重度抑郁症。呈现中度(6 - 8)症状严重抑郁症(> 8症状)和那些明显的自杀风险和/或高水平的个人障碍。允许应对心理干预应不超过2 - 4周,应规定之后,氟西汀。进一步的研究应关注评估特定的心理治疗的效果短暂的心理干预,确定患者的特点严重的抑郁症是谁没有响应氟西汀,复发预防严重抑郁和改善工具

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号