...
首页> 外文期刊>Health technology assessment: HTA >A systematic review of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of precancerous skin conditions, Barrett's oesophagus and cancers of the biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophagus and skin
【24h】

A systematic review of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of precancerous skin conditions, Barrett's oesophagus and cancers of the biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophagus and skin

机译:光动力治疗的系统评价治疗癌前皮肤状况,巴雷特食管和癌症的胆汁束、脑、头部和颈部,肺癌、食道癌和皮肤

获取原文

摘要

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the use of a light-sensitive drug, in combination with light of a visible wavelength, to destroy target cells. PDT is used either as a primary treatment or as an adjunctive treatment. It is fairly well accepted in clinical practice for some types of skin cancer but has yet to be fully explored as a treatment for other forms of cancer. Objective: To systematically review the clinical effectiveness and safety of PDT in the treatment of Barrett's oesophagus, pre-cancerous skin conditions and the following cancers: biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophageal and skin. Data sources: The search strategy included searching electronic databases (between August and October 2008), followed by update searches in May 2009, along with relevant bibliographies, existing reviews, conference abstracts and contact with experts in the field. Study designs: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in skin conditions and Barrett's oesophagus, non-randomized trials for all other sites. Participants: People with Barrett's oesophagus, precancerous skin conditions or primary cancer in the following sites: biliary tract, brain, head and neck, lung, oesophageal and skin. Intervention: Any type of PDT for either curative or palliative treatment. Comparators: Any comparator including differing applications of PDT treatments (relevant comparators varied according to the condition). Main outcomes: The outcomes measured were mortality, morbidity, quality of life, adverse events and resource use. Review methods: A standardised data extraction form was used. The quality of RCTs and non-randomised controlled studies was assessed using standard checklists. Data extracted from the studies were tabulated and discussed in a narrative synthesis, and the influence of study quality on results was discussed. Meta-analysis was used to estimate a summary measure of effect on relevant outcomes, with assessment of both clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts, and data extracted and quality assessed the trials, with discrepancies resolved by discussion or referral to a third reviewer. A scoping review was also undertaken. Results: Overall, 88 trials reported in 141 publications were included, with some trials covering more than one condition. For actinic keratosis (AK), the only clear evidence of effectiveness was that PDT appeared to be superior to placebo. For Bowen's disease, better outcomes with PDT were suggested when compared with cryotherapy or fluorouracil. For basal cell carcinoma (BCC), PDT may result in similar lesion response rates to surgery or cryotherapy but with better cosmetic outcomes. For nodular lesions, PDT appeared to be superior to placebo and less effective than surgery but suggestive of better cosmetic outcome. For Barrett's oesophagus, PDT in addition to omeprazole appeared to be more effective than omeprazole alone at long-term ablation of high-grade dysplasia and slowing/preventing progression to cancer. No firm conclusions could be drawn for PDT in oesophageal cancer. Further research into the role of PDT in lung cancer is needed. For cholangiocarcinoma, PDT may improve survival when compared with stenting alone. There was limited evidence on PDT for brain cancer and cancers of the head and neck. A wide variety of photosensitisers were used and, overall, no serious adverse effects were linked to PDT. Limitations: There were few well-conducted, adequately powered RCTs, and quality of life (QoL) and resource outcomes were under-reported. Problems were identified with reporting of key study features and quality parameters, making the reliability of some studies uncertain. Methodological limitations and gaps in the evidence base made it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Conclusions: Evidence of effectiveness was found for PDT in the treatment of AK and nodular BCC in relation to placebo, and possibly for treating Barrett's oesophagus
机译:背景:光动力疗法(PDT)是使用光敏药物的结合可见波长的光,摧毁目标细胞。或作为辅助治疗。接受某些类型的临床实践皮肤癌但尚未充分探讨其他形式的癌症治疗。旨在系统综述的临床PDT治疗的有效性和安全性巴雷特食管的癌前期的皮肤条件和癌症:胆汁束、脑、肺、食管的头部和颈部和皮肤。包括搜索之间的电子数据库2008年8月和10月),其次是更新搜索2009年5月,连同有关现有文献资料,综述、会议摘要和接触该领域的专家。研究设计:随机对照试验(相关的)的皮肤状况和巴雷特对于所有其他食管,非随机试验网站。或食道,癌前皮肤条件癌症主要在以下网站:胆汁束、脑、肺、食管的头部和颈部和皮肤。治疗或姑息治疗。比较器:任何比较器包括不同PDT治疗(相关的应用程序比较器根据条件不同)。主要结果:结果测量死亡率、发病率、生活质量、不良事件和资源使用。使用标准化的数据提取形式。相关的质量和non-randomised控制研究评估使用标准清单。数据从研究中提取列表在叙述和讨论合成,研究质量对结果的影响进行了讨论。摘要测量对相关结果的影响,评估的临床和统计非均质性。检查所有的标题和摘要,和数据提取和质量评估试验差异通过讨论来解决或转诊第三个审稿人。承担。包括141年的出版物,有一些试验涉及多个条件。光化性角化病(AK),唯一清晰的证据PDT似乎的效果优于安慰剂。结果与PDT建议相比冷冻疗法或氟尿嘧啶。癌(BCC), PDT可能导致类似病变手术或冷冻疗法,但反应率更好的美容效果。PDT似乎优于安慰剂和更少有效的手术,但是暗示更好整容的结果。除了奥美拉唑似乎更多比奥美拉唑独自住在长期有效消融的高档发育不良放缓/防止发展为癌症。结论可以为PDT在食管癌症。肺癌是必要的。PDT相比可以提高生存支架。对脑癌和头部和癌症的脖子。用,总的来说,没有严重的副作用PDT相连。品行端正的、充分动力相关的生活质量(QoL)和资源的结果低报。报告主要研究功能和质量参数,使一些的可靠性研究不确定。空白的证据基础很难公司得出结论。PDT治疗的有效性被发现AK和结节性BCC与安慰剂可能治疗巴雷特食管

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号