...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >The Double Krackow Suture Technique Does Not Offer a Significant Benefit Compared to the Krackow Suture Technique in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double-Loaded Suture Anchor
【24h】

The Double Krackow Suture Technique Does Not Offer a Significant Benefit Compared to the Krackow Suture Technique in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double-Loaded Suture Anchor

机译:不提供双Krackow缝合技术一个重要的相比Krackow中获益缝合技术在我们二头肌肌腱固定术使用轻型缝合锚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the biomechanical properties of the double simple suture (DSS) technique, Krackow suture (KS) technique, and double Krackow suture (DKS) technique in subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a double-loaded suture anchor in a porcine tendon model. Methods: A total of 30 artificial composite (polymer and glass fiber) humeri and porcine flexor profundus tendons with diameter of 4.5 mm were used. The sample size was determined based on the results of the pilot study. Metallic suture anchors with double-loaded No. 2 braided sutures were inserted at the subpectoral tenodesis site, 5 cm from the superomedial corner of the greater tuberosity. Three suture techniques were used to fix the tendons: a DSS used as the control, a KS, and a DKS, which is an alternative tendon graft fixation technique. A preload of 5 N was applied for 2 minutes, followed by cyclic loading for 500 cycles ranging from 5 to 70 N; next, a load-tofailure test at 1 mm/s was performed. Results: The KS (283.5 +/- 57 N) and DKS (270.4 +/- 50 N) groups had significantly greater ultimate failure loads as compared with the DSS group (84.1 +/- 6.4 N) (P < .001). Meanwhile, the peak displacement at failure loads in the KS group (9.3 +/- 2.2 mm) and DKS group (7.8 +/- 1.7 mm) were significantly smaller than that of the DSS group (11.3 +/- 2.9 mm) (P = .015). Stiffness in the DSS group (36.4 +/- 3.0 N/mm), KS group (39.6 +/- 2.5 N/mm), and DKS group (36.9 +/- 4.6 N/mm) was not significantly different (P = .125). All DSS constructs and 6 KS constructs failed with tendons being cut through by the sutures, whereas the other 4 KS constructs and all DKS constructs failed resulting from suture breakage. Conclusions: In this subpectoral biceps tenodesis model, both the KS technique and the DKS technique had similar time 0 biomechanical properties that were better than those of the double simple suture technique.
机译:目的:比较生物力学属性双简单缝合(DSS)的技术,Krackow缝合(KS)技术,双Krackow在我们的二头肌缝合(dk)技术使用轻型缝合锚在肌腱固定术猪腱模型。人工合成聚合物和玻璃纤维)肱骨和猪屈肌profundus肌腱直径4.5毫米。基于试验的结果决定的研究。2号编织缝合时插入我们腱固定术网站,5厘米的superomedial角落的大结节。三个缝合技术被用来修复肌腱:DSS用作控制,KS和dk,这是一个替代肌腱移植物固定技术。2分钟,其次是循环荷载为500周期从5到70 N;load-tofailure测试在1毫米/秒。结果:KS (283.5 + / - 57 N)和dk (270.4+ / - 50 N)组明显更大最终失效载荷与DSS相比组(84.1 + / - 6.4 N) (P <措施)。峰值位移在KS加载失败组(9.3 + / - 2.2毫米)和dk集团(7.8 + / - 1.7毫米)明显比小DSS组(11.3 + / - 2.9毫米)(P = .015)。DSS组(36.4 + / - 3.0 N /毫米),KS集团(39.6 + / - 2.5 N /毫米),和dk集团(36.9 + / - 4.6N /毫米)没有明显不同(P = .125)。所有DSS结构和6 KS构造失败了肌腱缝合线穿过的,而其他4 KS构造和dk从缝合断裂构造失败的结果。结论:在此我们二头肌肌腱固定术模型,KS技术和dk技术也有类似的时间0生物力学比的属性双简单缝合技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号