...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >A Comparison of Open-Construct PEEK Suture Anchor and Non-Vented Biocomposite Suture Anchor in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
【24h】

A Comparison of Open-Construct PEEK Suture Anchor and Non-Vented Biocomposite Suture Anchor in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:比较Open-Construct PEEK缝合锚和Non-Vented Biocomposite缝合锚关节镜肩袖修复:一个未来随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare radiologic bone ingrowth and the clinical outcomes of an open-construct (PEEK) (polyether ether ketone) suture anchor with those of a non-vented biocomposite suture anchor in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: Sixty-nine patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups based on type of suture anchors used for rotator cuff repair; group 1: open-construct PEEK anchor (36 patients), group 2: non-vented biocomposite anchor (33 patients). The status of bone ingrowth into the anchor and the presence of cyst formation were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively by computed tomography scan using the Modified Barber's ossification scale. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and visual analog scale score for pain and range of motion were evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography was performed at 12 months postoperatively to examine the integrity of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. Results: Significant improvements in shoulder function and pain relief were observed regardless of the anchor used (both Group 1 and 2; P < .001). No differences were found in functional scores and range of motion between the 2 groups. Group 1 showed better bone ingrowth grades than group 2 (poor 2.8 vs 24.2%, fair 27.8 vs 39.4%, good 38.9 vs 33.3%, and excellent 30.6 vs 3.0%; P < .001). The rate of cyst formation around the anchor on the 6 months' postoperative computed tomography (group 1: 14% and group 2: 12%) and re-tear rate at 12 months (5% each) showed no difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Shoulder function was improved after complete rotator cuff repair and similar clinical outcomes were achieved regardless of suture anchor material and shape. However, the open-construct PEEK anchor provided better bone ingrowth into the anchor than the non-vented biocomposite anchor at 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
机译:目的:比较放射骨头长在肉内的临床结果open-construct (PEEK)(聚醚醚酮)与缝合锚的non-vented biocomposite缝合锚患者关节镜肩袖修复。方法:六十九例患者被随机分配到两组基于类型的缝合锚用于肌腱套修理;open-construct PEEK锚(36例)2: non-vented biocomposite锚(33例)。骨到锚和的状态囊肿的形成进行了评估术后6个月计算机断层扫描扫描使用修改后的理发师的骨化规模。分数,分数不变,和视觉模拟尺度分数的疼痛和延展性评估。超声在12个月内进行术后检查的完整性修复肩袖肌腱。在肩功能和显著的改进缓解疼痛是观察到的不管使用锚(组1和2;在功能评分和差异被发现两组之间的运动范围。显示骨头长在肉内的成绩优于组2(可怜的2.8和24.2%,公平27.8和39.4%,38.9好vs 33.3%,优秀的30.6和3.0%;囊肿形成的速度在锚上6个月的术后ct(组1:14%,组2:12%)和re-tear率在12个月(5%)显示没有区别在两组之间。功能完整的肌腱套后改善修复和类似的临床结果不管缝合锚材料和实现形状。提供更好的骨头长在肉内锚比non-vented biocomposite锚定在6个月后关节镜肩袖修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号