...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Preoperative Diagnostic Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Stabilization Procedures for Panlabral Tear of the Glenohumeral Joint
【24h】

Preoperative Diagnostic Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Stabilization Procedures for Panlabral Tear of the Glenohumeral Joint

机译:术前诊断和临床结果关节镜稳定后程序Panlabral盂肱的眼泪联合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate preoperative diagnostic rates for panlabral tear using imaging studies or physical examinations and to evaluate clinical outcomes after arthroscopic stabilization procedures with 2 different patient surgical positions. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with panlabral tear and were followed up for at least 2 years were included. A panlabral tear was defined as labral tear involving at least 270 degrees of the glenoid surface on arthroscopic examination. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or MR arthrography and physical examinations including anterior apprehension, posterior jerk, and compressive rotation tests. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Rowe, and visual analog scale for pain scores, and recurrence rate. According to patient position during surgery, patients were divided into group I (beach chair position) and group II (lateral decubitus position). Results: Forty-eight patients (24 in group I and 24 in group II) were enrolled. Preoperative MR imaging or MR arthrography detected only 18.8% of panlabral tears. No patient had positive findings on all 3 physical examination tests for panlabral tear. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved after operation (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score: 58.4 +/- 6.2 preoperatively, 85.2 +/- 6.4 at the final, P < .001; Rowe score: 49.0 +/- 12.2 preoperatively, 86.8 +/- 9.1 at the final, P < .001) and postoperative recurrence was occurred in 1patient (2%). No differences were found in clinical outcomes and recurrence rate (4% vs 0%) according to patient positioning, despite the larger number of suture anchors used in group II (6.2 +/- 1.5 in group I, 7.6 +/- 1.1 in group II, P < .001). Conclusions: It remained difficult to preoperatively diagnose panlabral tear using standard physical examinations and imaging studies. Nevertheless, arthroscopic stabilization procedures for patients with panlabral tear provided satisfactory clinical outcomes with a low recurrence rate. Patient position during surgery did not alter clinical outcomes and recurrence rate, despite the use of different numbers of suture anchors.
机译:目的:评价术前诊断使用成像研究或对panlabral撕裂体格检查和评估临床结果关节镜稳定后与两个不同病人的手术程序的位置。关节镜稳定复发前肩膀panlabral撕裂和不稳定随访至少2年了。panlabral眼泪被定义为上唇的眼泪涉及至少270度的关节窝表面关节镜检查。接受术前磁共振(先生)成像或关节摄影术先生和物理考试包括前理解,后混蛋,和旋转压测试。的临床结果进行了评估美国的肩部和肘部的外科医生,罗,疼痛视觉模拟量表分数复发率。在手术中,病人被分成组我(沙滩椅位置)和组II(横向卧位位置)。病人在第二组我和24组(24)登记。关节摄影术中发现只有18.8%的panlabral泪水。体检测试panlabral眼泪。临床结果明显改善手术后(美国的肩部和肘部外科医生得分:58.4 + / - 6.2术前,85.2在最后的+ / - 6.4,P <措施;术前+ / - 12.2,86.8 + / - 9.1最后,P <措施)和术后复发发生在1例(2%)。临床结果和复发率根据病人定位(4% vs 0%),尽管大量的缝合锚在第二组(6.2 + / - 1.5在我组,7.6 + / - 1.1在第二组,P <措施)。术前诊断panlabral困难使用标准的体检和眼泪成像研究。患者稳定程序panlabral撕裂提供令人满意的临床结果低复发率。在手术过程中没有改变的临床地位结果和复发率,尽管使用不同数量的缝合锚。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号