...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >The Critical Shoulder Angle Shows a Reciprocal Change in Magnitude When Evaluating Symptomatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Versus Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis as Compared With Control Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

The Critical Shoulder Angle Shows a Reciprocal Change in Magnitude When Evaluating Symptomatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Versus Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis as Compared With Control Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:关键的肩角显示了互惠当评估症状级的变化全层肩袖撕裂和初选相比之下,盂肱骨关节炎对照组:系统回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine whether a high critical shoulder angle (CSA) is associated with symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears and/or whether a low C SA is associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). Methods: A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All observational studies that examined an association between CSA and full-thickness RC tears and/or primary GHOA were included. A primary meta-analysis was performed including all studies that met the inclusion criteria regardless of radiographic quality. A secondary meta-analysis was performed to explore the hypothesis that radiographic quality was a source of heterogeneity, which excluded those studies in which radiograph quality was not strictly defined and controlled. Results: For the primary meta-analysis, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for RC tears and 5 for primary GHOA. The C SA was greater in the RC tear group than the control group (mean difference 4.03 degrees, 95% confidence interval 2.95 degrees-5.11, 95% prediction interval 0.0487 degrees-8.01 degrees; P < .001). The C SA was lower in the GHOA group than the control group (mean difference -3.98 degrees, 95% confidence interval -5.66 degrees to -2.31 degrees, 95% prediction interval -10.2 degrees to -2.19 degrees; P < .001).A high level of heterogeneity was observed in the RC tear analysis (I-2 = 88.4), which decreased after the exclusion of 5 studies based on radiographic quality (I-2 = 75.3). A high level of heterogeneity also was observed in the primary GHOA analysis (I-2 = 87.3), which decreased after the exclusion of 2 studies based on the radiographic quality (I-2 = 48.2). Conclusions: There is a reciprocal change in magnitude of the C SA when evaluating symptomatic full-thickness RC tears versus primary GHOA as compared with control subjects. Radiographic quality is a source of heterogeneity in studies that investigate a link between C SA and RC tears and primary GHOA.
机译:目的:确定一个较高的关键肩角(CSA)有关症状全层肌腱套(RC)眼泪和/或低C SA是否相关原发性骨关节炎盂肱(GHOA)。方法:系统回顾首选项报告系统评价和荟萃分析指南。所有检查一个观察性研究CSA和全层钢筋混凝土之间的联系眼泪和/或主要GHOA都包括在内。主要进行荟萃分析包括所有研究符合入选标准不论射线质量。荟萃分析进行了探讨假设射线质量是一个来源排除这些研究的异质性这些x光照片质量没有严格定义和控制。荟萃分析,11的研究遇到了包容标准为主要GHOA RC眼泪和5。C SA在RC撕裂组比更大对照组(平均差4.03度,95%置信区间2.95度- 5.11,95%预测区间0.0487度- 8.01度;P <措施)。比对照组(-3.98平均差度,95%置信区间-5.66度-2.31度,95%的预测区间-10.2度到-2.19度;RC观察异质性的眼泪分析(我2 = 88.4),减少后排除5研究基于射线照相质量(我2 = 75.3)。在初选中异质性也被观察到GHOA分析(我2 = 87.3),减少2研究基于的排斥射线照相质量(我2 = 48.2)。有一个互惠的大小的变化C SA在评估症状全层RC眼泪与主要GHOA相比控制对象。在研究的异质性来源调查C SA和RC眼泪和之间的联系主要GHOA。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号