...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >A Multisite Injection Is More Effective Than a Single Glenohumeral Injection of Corticosteroid in the Treatment of Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

A Multisite Injection Is More Effective Than a Single Glenohumeral Injection of Corticosteroid in the Treatment of Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:一个比一个多点注射更有效单盂肱注射皮质类固醇主要治疗冻结肩:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the possible effects of multisite injection therapy around the shoulder and prospectively compare the pain relief, range of motion (ROM), and functional scores of randomly selected patients with primary frozen shoulder using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the University of CaliforniaeLos Angeles score after the completion of a standard physiotherapy program. Methods: Seventy-six patients with primary frozen shoulder were randomly divided into 2 groups based on the treatment: multisite injection and single injection. In the multisite-injection group, the glenohumeral joint and posteroinferior capsule, subacromial space, posterosuperior capsule, biceps long head, and coracohumeral ligament were injected with a combination of 2 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL), 4 mL of bupivacaine (0.5%), and 34 mL of saline solution. The glenohumeral joint in the single-injection group was injected with 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL) and 2 mL of bupivacaine (0.5%). Patients in both groups underwent physical therapy using the same protocol. Patients were evaluated for pain (visual analog scale score), functional status, and active and passive joint ROM at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year after the injection. Results: The follow-up rate was 82.6%, and significantly lower VAS scores were recorded in all periods in the multisite-injection group compared with the single-injection group (P 1/4 .01). In terms of active and passive ROM, the follow-up results were significantly better in the multisite-injection group (P < .05). Significantly higher functional scores were recorded in the multisite-injection group (P < .05). Conclusions: Both treatments were effective in patients with primary frozen shoulder. However, the multisiteinjection technique provided better pain palliation, better ROM restoration, and better functional results than the single glenohumeral injection in patients with primary frozen shoulder who were treated with the same physiotherapy regimen. Level of Evidence: Level I, prognostic comparative study.
机译:目的:探讨可能的影响多点注射疗法在肩膀上和前瞻性比较疼痛,范围运动(ROM),功能很多随机选择的患者主要冻结使用美国的肩部和肘部的肩膀外科医生分数和大学CaliforniaeLos洛杉矶评分完成后标准的理疗项目。七十六例原发性冻结肩被随机分成2组根据治疗:多点注入和单身注入。盂肱关节和posteroinferior胶囊,峰下空间,后上的胶囊,肱二头肌长脑袋,coracohumeral韧带注射2毫升的组合去炎松醋酸酯(40毫克/毫升),4毫升bupivacaine(0.5%),和34毫升生理盐水。盂肱关节单独注入组注射1毫升的曲安奈德醋酸酯(40毫克/毫升)和2毫升bupivacaine(0.5%)。物理治疗使用相同的协议。对患者进行评估(视觉模拟疼痛量表分数)、功能状态和积极被动联合罗1、3和6个月和1年复一年的注入。率为82.6%,显著降低血管成绩记录在所有时间multisite-injection组相比只要注射组(P 1/4 . 01)。主动和被动ROM,后续结果更好的吗multisite-injection组(P < . 05)。明显高于功能分数记录multisite-injection组(P <. 05)。患者主要冻结肩。然而,multisiteinjection技术提供更好的疼痛减轻,更好的ROM修复和功能结果比单一盂肱注射的病人与主要治疗冻结肩同样的理疗方案。证据:我,预后比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号