...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Safety and Efficacy of an Amniotic Suspension Allograft Injection Over 12 Months in a Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial for Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy of an Amniotic Suspension Allograft Injection Over 12 Months in a Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial for Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee

机译:羊膜悬架的安全性和有效性同种异体移植物注入超过12个月单盲、随机对照试验膝骨关节炎症状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) and saline at up to 12 months of follow-up through the use of patient-reported outcomes, immunoglobulin levels, and anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) levels. Methods: Within this multicenter study, 200 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a single intra-articular injection of saline, HA, or ASA. Patient-reported outcomes, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analog scale (VAS) score, were collected at multiple time points (baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months) out to 12 months to assess improvements in pain and function. Radiographs at baseline and 12 months were taken to determine radiographic changes, while blood was collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months to determine changes in immunoglobulins and anti-HLA levels. Statistical analyses were performed using last observation carried forward and mixed effects model for repeated measures. Results: Treatment with ASA resulted in significant improvements in KOOS and VAS scores that were maintained through 12 months (P .05). Treatment with ASA resulted in a 63.2% responder rate at 12 months using the Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical TrialseOsteoarthritis Research Society International simplified definition. There were no significant differences between groups for radiographic measures in the index knee, immunoglobulins, C-reactive protein, or anti-HLA serum levels (P .05). The number and type of adverse events (AEs) reported for ASA were comparable to the HA injection group, while no treatment-emergent AEs were reported for the saline group. Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial of ASA vs HA and saline for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis demonstrated clinically meaningful improved outcomes with ASA over the controls out to 12 months postinjection. No concerning immunologic or adverse reactions to the ASA injection were identified with regards to severe AEs, immunoglobulin, or anti-HLA levels. Level of Evidence: Level I, randomized controlled multicenter trial.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定羊膜悬挂同种异体移植物的功效(ASA)相比,透明质酸(HA)和生理盐水在12个月的后续使用patient-reported结果,免疫球蛋白水平和反人类白细胞抗原(HLA)的水平。200名患者被随机分配比单一关节内注射生理盐水,哈,或亚撒。Patient-reported结果,包括膝盖受伤和骨关节炎评分(三星)和结果视觉模拟量表(血管)得分,收集在多个时间点(基线,1周,6周、3个月、6个月)至12个月评估改善疼痛和功能。射线照片在基线和12个月确定射线的变化,而血液收集在基线,6周,6个月确定免疫球蛋白的变化anti-HLA水平。使用最后一次执行观察发扬光大和混合效应模型重复措施。结果:治疗ASA导致显著改善三星和脉管的分数在12个月内保持(P . 05)。ASA治疗导致63.2%的回答者率在12个月内使用结果措施关节炎临床TrialseOsteoarthritis研究国际社会简化定义。没有显著的差异组射线措施在索引中膝盖,免疫球蛋白、c反应蛋白或anti-HLA血清水平(P . 05)。类型的不良事件为ASA (AEs)报道与HA注射组,而没有治疗诱发的AEs的报道生理盐水组。ASA vs HA和盐水的对照试验治疗膝关节骨关节炎症状证明临床有意义的改进结果与ASA控制12个月接受。ASA注入或不良反应确定关于严重的AEs,免疫球蛋白或anti-HLA水平。证据:一级,随机对照多中心试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号