...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Editorial Commentary: Mechanics Versus Biology: Both Are Relevant Principles in Understanding Superior Capsular Reconstruction
【24h】

Editorial Commentary: Mechanics Versus Biology: Both Are Relevant Principles in Understanding Superior Capsular Reconstruction

机译:编辑注:力学和生物学:都是有关原则的理解优越的荚膜重建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The topic of superior capsular reconstruction remains controversial. Whereas identifying the best time-zero graft configuration for this procedure remains important, the success or failure of the procedure will be dependent on the biology, not just the bench performance. Any conforming object placed in the subacromial space at time zero could center the humeral head and decrease superior translation compared with a massive rotator cuff tear but may not restore translation to normal. It does appear that a thicker graft is better in this regard, but how much thicker is better is unclear. Most of all, whether the mechanical benefits of a thicker graft will be offset by a thicker and potentially less biologically compatible construct is also unclear. In most orthopaedic settings, autografts remain consistently superior to allografts. The contrast in results may be better explained by biology, and the excellent superior capsular reconstruction results reported with autograft have not been replicated universally with dermal allograft.
机译:优越的荚膜重建的主题仍然是有争议的。最好的时刻0贪污配置过程仍然重要,成功或失败的过程将依赖生物,而不仅仅是板凳上的性能。符合对象放置在峰下空间在时刻0可以肱骨头和中心高级翻译而降低大规模的肩袖撕裂,但可能不会恢复翻译正常。厚贪污是更好的在这方面,但如何更厚更多少还不清楚。是否更厚的机械效益贪污将抵消厚的和潜在的生物兼容的构造也少不清楚。保持一贯优于异体移植。对比的结果可能是更好的解释生物学,优秀卓越的荚膜重建结果与自体报道没有被复制和真皮普遍吗同种异体移植物。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号