...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Comparisons of electron energy deposition derived from observations of lower thermospheric nitric oxide and from X-ray bremsstrahlung measurements
【24h】

Comparisons of electron energy deposition derived from observations of lower thermospheric nitric oxide and from X-ray bremsstrahlung measurements

机译:比较电子能量沉积从观测低thermospheric氮氧化和x射线轫致辐射测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies have shown the connection between electron precipitation and the excess amounts of nitric oxide at auroral latitudes. In this study the electron energy deposition derived from thermospheric nitric oxide (NO) measurements is compared with the electron energy deposition derived from X-ray bremsstrahlung measurements. The electron energy deposition is derived from nitric oxide densities by use of a photochemical model for nitric oxide and is referred to as the modeled energy deposition. The comparisons are made for the beginning of five geomagnetic storms in 1998: 21 March, 2 May, 14 June, 26 June, and 16 July. By using these quite different methods to derive the total electron energy deposition (4–100 keV), the results show that we have a generally good understanding of the physics and chemistry of the energy transfer from electron precipitation in the lower thermosphere. The comparisons also show some discrepancies. The modeled energy deposition is typically larger than the energy deposition derived from X-ray bremsstrahlung in the beginning of the storm period, whereas later on in the storm the energy deposition derived from X-ray measurements is largest. The cases where the modeled energy deposition is largest is probably due to production of NO occurring before the bremsstrahlung measurements. The systematic underestimate of the calculated energy deposition could be due to uncertainties in the reaction rates or in the characteristic electron energy used in the photochemical model. The effects from horizontal neutral wind on the NO gas from the production on the nightside to the observations on the dayside can also be a source of discrepancy.
机译:先前的研究显示之间的联系电子的沉淀和多余的数量一氧化氮在极光纬度。电子能量沉积来自thermospheric一氧化氮(NO)的测量相比之下,电子能量沉积来自x射线轫致辐射测量。电子能量沉积来自通过使用光化学一氧化氮密度一氧化氮和被称为模型建模的能量沉积。为五个地磁风暴的开始1998年3月21日,5月2日,6月14日,6月26日,7月16日。获得总电子能量沉积(4 - 100 keV),结果表明,我们有一个对物理的理解,一般好化学的能量传递电子降低热成降水。比较也显示一些差异。建模的能量沉积通常是更大的比能量沉积来自x射线在风暴的开始轫致辐射期,而稍后在暴风雨的能量沉积来自x射线测量最大。沉积是最大的可能是由于生产前没有发生轫致辐射测量。低估的计算能量沉积可能是由于不确定性的反应利率或电子能量特征用于光化学模型。没有气体的水平中性风生产的阴面观测的光面上也可以的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号