...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE journal on electromagnetic compatibility practice and applications >Comparison of Extrapolation Methods for Truncated Cable Response Transfer Functions Used in De-Embedding Time-Domain Measurements
【24h】

Comparison of Extrapolation Methods for Truncated Cable Response Transfer Functions Used in De-Embedding Time-Domain Measurements

机译:比较的外推方法截断电缆响应传递函数中使用De-Embedding时域测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This letter presents a comparison of three extrapolation methods used to reconstruct the missing parts of truncated cable response transfer functions (TFs) used to de-embed measured transient electromagnetic signals. In the first method (M1), the magnitude of the known TF at the extreme frequencies is kept constant for all the unknown frequencies. The second method (M2) uses a linear extrapolation of the magnitude of the known TF at the highest frequency and a decade earlier. The third method (M3) uses the known portions of the TF to extract its minimum phase function, using the discrete Hilbert transform integrals. The performance of the three methods is analyzed for different rise times of the incident field and with practical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the oscilloscope input. For noise-free signals, M1 and M2 outperform M3 for almost all the considered rise times. On the other hand, the three methods produce errors within the same order of magnitude for noised signals. Given the complexity and computational time required to implement M3, it is suggested that M1 or M2 are used in practical applications.
机译:这封信是一个比较三个外推方法用于重建失踪的部分截断电缆的回应用于de-embed传输函数(TFs)测量瞬变电磁信号。第一种方法(M1)的大小TF在极端的频率保持不变对所有未知的频率。方法(M2)使用一个线性外推的级的TF在最高频率和十年前。(M3)使用TF的已知部分提取其最小相位函数,使用离散希耳伯特变换积分。分析了三种方法对不同的上升次事件的领域和实用信噪比(信噪比)示波器输入。超越M3为几乎所有的考虑上升次了。产生错误在同一个数量级对噪声信号。实现M3,所需计算时间M1和M2是建议用于实用应用程序。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号