首页> 外文期刊>Pain practice: the official journal of World Institute of Pain >Retrospective evaluation of clinical characteristics, pharmacotherapy and healthcare resource use among patients prescribed pregabalin or duloxetine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in usual care.
【24h】

Retrospective evaluation of clinical characteristics, pharmacotherapy and healthcare resource use among patients prescribed pregabalin or duloxetine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in usual care.

机译:回顾性的临床评价特点、药物治疗和医疗保健资源使用与患者中规定和度洛西汀对糖尿病周围神经病变在常规治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment patterns and costs among patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) newly prescribed pregabalin or duloxetine in usual care settings. METHODS: Using the PharMetrics(R) Database, patients with pDPN (ICD-9-CM codes 357.2 or 250.6x) newly prescribed pregabalin or duloxetine were identified. Patients initiated on duloxetine (n=713; mean age 55.4 +/- 9.5 years) were propensity score-matched with patients initiated on pregabalin (n=713; mean age 56.3 +/- 9.3 years). Prevalence of comorbidities, pain-related pharmacotherapy and healthcare resource use/costs (pharmacy, outpatient, inpatient, total) were examined during the 12 months preceding (pre-index) and following (follow-up) the date of the first pregabalin or duloxetine prescription. RESULTS: Both cohorts had multiple comorbidities and a substantial pain medication burden. Among pregabalin patients, use of other anticonvulsants (35.6% vs. 24.7%) and tricyclic antidepressants significantly decreased (18.2% vs. 13.7%) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) increased (7.9 % vs. 12.9%) in the follow-up period; all P values <0.05. Among duloxetine patients, use of other SNRIs (8.7% vs. 5.2%) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors decreased significantly (32.1% vs. 18.9%) in the follow-up period, but there were increases for anticonvulsants (42.1% vs. 48.4%), benzodiazepines (25.5% vs. 32%), and sedative/hypnotics (22.6% vs. 25.8%); all P values <0.05. Among pregabalin and duloxetine patients there were increases (P<0.05) in pharmacy, outpatient, and total healthcare costs from the pre-index to the follow-up period. Total medication costs in the follow-up period were significantly higher for duloxetine (median Dollars 6,763 [IQR Dollars 3,970-Dollars 10,914]) relative to pregabalin (median Dollars 6,059 [IQR Dollars 3,277-Dollars 9,865]); P=0.0017. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pDPN prescribed pregabalin and duloxetine were characterized by a substantial comorbidity and pain medication burden. Although there were no differences in total healthcare costs, medication costs were significantly higher in the duloxetine cohort relative to the pregabalin cohort.
机译:摘要目的:评价模式和治疗成本在痛苦的糖尿病患者周围神经病变(pDPN)新规定与度洛西汀或常规治疗的设置。方法:使用PharMetrics (R)的数据库,pDPN患者(357.2或ICD-9-CM代码250.6 x)新开普加巴林或度洛西汀被确定。(n = 713;倾向score-matched患者普瑞巴林(n = 713;年)。药物治疗和医疗资源使用/成本(制药、门诊、住院总)在12个月前检查(预先索引)和(后续)的日期第一个普瑞巴林或度洛西丁处方。结果:两组有多种并发症和大量的止痛药的负担。普瑞巴林的病人,使用其他抗惊厥药物(35.6%比24.7%)和三环类抗抑郁药明显降低(18.2%比13.7%)serotonin-norepinephrine再摄取抑制剂(snri类)增加(7.9%比12.9%)随访期间;度洛西汀的患者,使用其他snri类(8.7% vs。5.2%)和选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂显著降低(32.1%比18.9%)随访期间,但有增加抗惊厥药物(42.1%比48.4%),苯二氮卓类(25.5%比32%)镇静、催眠药(22.6%比25.8%);值< 0.05。患者有增加(P < 0.05)门诊药房,总医疗费用从预先索引到后续阶段。在随访期间药物成本明显高于度洛西丁(中位数美元6763 (IQR美元3970 - 10914美元))相对于普加巴林(平均6059美元[差美元3277 - 9865美元));结论:患者pDPN规定普瑞巴林和度洛西汀的特征重大疾病和止痛药负担。总医疗费用,医疗成本度洛西汀组显著提高相对于普加巴林队列。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号