...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Modelling the effects of management on population dynamics: some lessons from annual weeds
【24h】

Modelling the effects of management on population dynamics: some lessons from annual weeds

机译:模型管理人口的影响动态:一些教训年度杂草

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1. Agricultural and invasive weeds are major threats to managed and natural ecosystems, costing billions of dollars annually. Models for arable and invasive weed population dynamics can contribute to the management of problem species through generating predictions of population densities, and how those are likely to respond to changing management. Frequently, however, little attention is paid to quantifying the errors in estimates of model parameters and how these may affect the robustness of model predictions. 2. Most weed models are parameterized using a combination of field-estimated and literature-derived parameters. Only rarely are estimates of error available for all parameters, despite the fact that most parameters will be subject to considerable error. 3. Close to extinction boundaries, predictions of population densities may be highly sensitive to small errors in model parameters. However, because of their generally high reproductive capacities, many weeds may occur at high and economically significant densities while close to extinction. Consequently, models may be numerically unstable at ecologically realistic densities. 4. We review methods of dealing with parameter uncertainty in weed modelling. We stress that it is important to recognize that many models may be structurally incorrect and all stabilizing mechanisms may not have been identified. Also, alternative model forms have seldom been explored, although a variety of alternatives to conventional difference equations exist. 5. Synthesis and applications. Only when different management interventions have greatly contrasting effects on population sizes are most models of weed populations likely to provide qualitatively correct predictions of their effects. Quantitative predictions from demographic models will usually be subject to large errors. Modelling methods that account for spatial heterogeneity and other stabilizing effects may yield more accurate predictions; however, their parameterization will often require approaches for data collection very different from those currently used.
机译:1. 管理和自然生态系统,威胁每年花费数十亿美元。耕地和入侵杂草种群动态导致物种的管理问题通过生成的预测人口密度,和那些可能会如何应对改变管理。注意量化误差模型参数和如何将这些可能的估计影响模型预测的鲁棒性。大多数杂草模型使用一个参数化field-estimated和literature-derived参数。所有参数的估计误差,尽管事实上,大多数参数受到相当大的误差。灭绝的边界,预测的人口密度可能是高度敏感的小错误在模型参数。一般高生殖能力,许多杂草可能发生在高和经济重要的密度而濒临灭绝。因此,模型可能数值不稳定在生态现实的密度。处理参数的不确定性的方法杂草造型。认识到许多模型可能结构错误和不稳定机制已确定。形式很少被探索,虽然各种各样的替代传统差分方程存在。应用程序。干预措施大大截然不同的影响人口规模是杂草的大多数模型人口可能提供定性正确的预测效果。从人口模型定量预测通常会受到大的错误。造型方法,占空间异质性和其他稳定的影响产量更准确的预测;参数化通常需要方法从这些数据收集非常不同目前使用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号