...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress
【24h】

Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress

机译:植物群落的收敛性和发散轨迹作为监测的框架湿地恢复进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1. Environmental policies that use ecological restoration to offset the destruction of natural ecosystems assume that restorations readily compensate for the losses because they progress reliably and predictably over time, following deterministic successional trajectories. However, succession and restoration are spatially and historically contingent processes, often characterized by divergent trajectories that deviate from expectations.2. We develop a framework for monitoring restorations that integrates two ideas from succession theory: convergence vs. divergence in species composition among successional sites, and progression towards vs. deviation from an expected community state. We apply this framework to short- and long-term monitoring data from 11 restored wetlands in Illinois, USA, by comparing plant species composition among restored wetlands over time and between restored wetlands and two sets of reference wetlands (high integrity, 'target' wetlands and low integrity, degraded wetlands).3. Over the first 4 years, restored wetlands that were initially similar in species composition diverged, progressing towards different high integrity target states. Planting a large number of native species in restorations increased their similarity to reference wetlands.4. Over longer time scales (5-11 years post-restoration), however, restored wetlands deviated from the ideal trajectory and converged upon the species composition of degraded wetlands, mainly because of non-native species invasion.5. Synthesis and applications. Framing restoration trajectories in terms of compositional convergence/divergence and progression towards/deviation from an acceptable range of reference sites is useful for monitoring restoration progress, identifying constraints to success and predicting restoration outcomes. Barriers to restoration, including non-native species and a lack of native propagules, can limit long-term progression towards target communities and constrain restoration to undesirable outcomes. Furthermore, convergence of restored wetlands on an undesirable community state limits the effectiveness of wetland mitigation policies.
机译:1. 恢复,以抵消对自然的破坏认为生态系统修复赔偿损失,因为他们的进步可靠的和可以预见的是随着时间的推移,确定性的连续性的轨迹。空间和演替和恢复历史上或有流程,经常以不同的轨迹偏离expectations.2。监控修复的框架从继承理论集成了两个概念:收敛与发散在物种组成在接连的网站,和发展方向与偏离预期的社会状态。我们对短期和长期应用这个框架从11恢复湿地监测数据美国伊利诺斯州,通过比较植物物种随着时间的推移,恢复湿地和成分恢复湿地和两组之间参考湿地(高完整性,“目标”湿地和低完整性、退化湿地)。3。在第一个四年,恢复湿地最初在物种组成相似吗对不同高分化,进步完整性目标状态。在修复增加了本地物种参考wetlands.4相似。时间尺度post-restoration第5 - 11(年),然而,恢复湿地偏离了理想的轨迹和聚合的物种退化湿地的组成,主要是因为invasion.5的入侵物种。应用程序。的成分/发散和收敛性发展/可接受的偏差参考网站是有用的监测范围恢复进展,确定约束成功和预测恢复的结果。修复障碍,包括非物种和缺乏本地繁殖体,可以限制长期发展目标社区和限制恢复不受欢迎的结果。在一个不受欢迎的社区恢复湿地国家限制湿地的有效性缓解政策。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号