...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Surrounding habitats mediate the trade-off between land-sharing and land-sparing agriculture in the tropics
【24h】

Surrounding habitats mediate the trade-off between land-sharing and land-sparing agriculture in the tropics

机译:周围的栖息地调解之间的权衡land-sharing和land-sparing农业热带地区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

1. Two strategies are often promoted to mitigate the effects of agricultural expansion on biodiversity: one integrates wildlife-friendly habitats within farmland (land sharing), and the other intensifies farming to allow the offset of natural reserves (land sparing). Their relative merits for biodiversity protection have been subject to much debate, but no previous study has examined whether trade-offs between the two strategies depend on the proximity of farmed areas to large tracts of natural habitat. 2. We sampled birds and dung beetles across contiguous forests and agricultural landscapes (low-intensity cattle farming) in a threatened hotspot of endemism: the Colombian Chocó-Andes. We test the hypothesis that the relative biodiversity benefits of either strategy depend partially on the degree to which farmlands are isolated from large contiguous blocks of forest. 3. We show that distance from forest mediates the occurrence of many species within farmland. For the majority of species, occurrence on farmland depends on both isolation from forest and the proportionate cover of small-scale wildlife-friendly habitats within the farm landscape, with both variables having a similar overall magnitude of effect on occurrence probabilities. 4. Simulations suggest that the biodiversity benefits of land sharing decline significantly with increasing distance from forest, but land sparing benefits remain consistent. In farm management units situated close to large contiguous forest (<500 m), land sharing is predicted to provide equal benefits to land sparing, but land sparing becomes increasingly superior in management units situated further from forest (1500 m). The predicted biodiversity benefits of land sparing are similar across all distances, provided that sparing mechanisms genuinely deliver protection for contiguous forest tracts. 5. Synthesis and applications. The persistence of bird and dung beetle communities in lowintensity pastoral agriculture is strongly linked to the proximity of surrounding contiguous forests. Land-sharing policies that promote the integration of small-scale wildlife-friendly habitats might be of limited benefit without simultaneous measures to protect larger blocks of natural habitat, which could be achieved via land-sparing practices. Policymakers should carefully consider the extent and distribution of remaining contiguous natural habitats when designing agri-environment schemes in the tropics.
机译:1. 农业扩张的影响生物多样性:一个wildlife-friendly集成栖息地内农田土地(共享),其他加剧农业允许抵消自然保护区保留(土地)。生物多样性保护价值受到很大争议,但没有以前的研究检查是否在两者之间权衡策略依赖于人工养殖的距离地区的大片自然栖息地。在连续的采样鸟类和金龟子森林和农业景观(低强度牛耕作)威胁热点的特有现象:哥伦比亚Choco-Andes。我们测试的假设相对策略取决于生物多样性的好处部分在农田的程度孤立的从大型相邻的块的森林。3.发生的许多物种在农田。大多数的物种,出现在农田取决于隔绝森林和适当的小规模的封面wildlife-friendly栖息地内的农场景观,这两个变量有一个类似的整体大小的影响概率。陆地生物多样性的好处分享下降显著增加距离森林,但土地节约的好处仍然存在一致的。接近大型连续森林(< 500),土地共享是预测提供平等的福利节约土地,但土地节约越来越多的上级管理单位位于远离森林(1500)。预测生物多样性土地节约的好处所有相似距离,提供吗保留机制真正提供保护连续的森林大片。应用程序。甲虫社区lowintensity田园农业是高度与距离有关周围的森林。促进一体化的政策小规模wildlife-friendly栖息地有限的没有同步措施中获益为了保护更大块的自然栖息地,通过land-sparing可以实现吗实践。的程度和分布当设计连续的自然栖息地在热带地区农耕环境规划把部分耕地退还作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号