...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Is eutrophication really a major impairment for small waterbody biodiversity?
【24h】

Is eutrophication really a major impairment for small waterbody biodiversity?

机译:富营养化是一个主要障碍小严禁生物多样性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1. Eutrophication remains a major stress for freshwater biodiversity. Its deleterious consequences on biodiversity are well documented for large waterbodies. However, the impact of eutrophication may differ in smaller waterbodies, such as ponds and small lakes, which generally support naturally high levels of nutrients in lowlands. Furthermore, this response could depend on the scale considered, from local (individual waterbody, alpha diversity) to regional (the network of waterbodies, gamma diversity). It is also unclear whether the richness of threatened species responds in the same way as the richness of the whole assemblage. 2. The present study investigates local-and regional-scale consequences of eutrophication on taxonomic richness (all taxa) and conservation value (threatened taxa) in temperate lowland small waterbodies. Five taxonomic groups were investigated: macrophytes, gastropods, water beetles, adult dragonflies and amphibians, in a set of natural waterbodies and a set of enriched waterbodies covering a large nutrient gradient from mesotrophic to hypertrophic conditions. 3. Globally, our study did not reveal consistent, systematic responses to eutrophication. For macrophytes, the richness and conservation value suffered from eutrophication at both local and regional scales. In contrast, for amphibians and gastropods, eutrophication did not impair biodiversity at the local nor the regional scale. Dragonflies and water beetles showed intermediate situations, with an impairment by eutrophication varying according to the type of waterbodies considered. At the regional scale, each trophic status, even the nutrient richest, brought an original contribution to biodiversity. 4. Synthesis and applications. The management of eutrophication for small lowland waterbodies has to be considered differently than for lakes. For an individual waterbody (the local scale), nutrient enrichment is not necessarily a major impairment and its impact depends on the taxonomic group considered. Conversely, at the landscape scale, eutrophication is a major pressure on small waterbody biodiversity, especially because nutrient-rich small waterbodies are dominant in the landscape. Therefore, conservation efforts should integrate the notion of pond regional networks or 'pondscapes', where the regional biodiversity is supported by a mosaic of trophic conditions, and promote the presence of less rich waterbodies.
机译:1. 淡水生物多样性。影响生物多样性都记录在案对于大型水体。在较小的水体富营养化也会有所不同,池塘和小湖泊等支持自然高水平的营养低地。考虑规模,从本地(个人区域(严禁,α多样性)网络的水体,γ多样性)。也不清楚丰富的威胁丰富物种以同样的方式回应整个组合。调查当地和对地区级的核富营养化的分类结果丰富(所有类群)和保护价值(威胁分类群)在温带低地小水体。调查:大型植物、腹足类、水甲虫,成年蜻蜓和两栖动物,集丰富的自然水体和一组水体覆盖大量养分梯度从中滋育的肥厚性条件。在全球范围内,我们的研究没有揭示一致,系统对富营养化的反应。大型植物,丰富性和保护价值从本地和富营养化区域尺度。腹足类,富营养化没有损害生物多样性在当地和区域范围内。蜻蜓和水甲虫显示中间情况下,与富营养化的障碍根据不同类型的水体考虑。状态,即使营养丰富,带了一个最初对生物多样性的贡献。合成和应用程序。水体富营养化对小型低地要考虑不同的湖泊。一个人严禁(当地规模),营养浓缩不一定是主要的取决于障碍及其影响分类群。景观尺度,富营养化是一个专业压力小严禁生物多样性,特别是因为营养丰富的小水体景观是显性的。因此,保护工作应该整合区域网络或池塘的概念“pondscapes”,区域生物多样性在哪里支持马赛克的营养条件,促进更丰富的水体的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号