首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >How do individual farmers' objectives influence the evaluation of rangeland management strategies under a variable climate?
【24h】

How do individual farmers' objectives influence the evaluation of rangeland management strategies under a variable climate?

机译:个体农民如何影响目标牧场管理策略的评价在气候变量?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. Management decisions by farmers are influenced by complex interrelations of ecological, economic and social factors. Of equal importance are the individual farmers' objectives. However, their relevance has been rarely considered in analyses of management decisions in farming systems. This study systematically analyses the role of farmers' objectives in their decision-making under various climatic conditions, with dryland grazing systems as a case study. 2. We develop a generic ecological-economic simulation model to compare the performance of a range of fixed grazing strategies under two objectives: (i) maximizing expected utility under risk aversion and (ii) achieving stochastic viability ('safety first'). We investigate combined effects of several management components in rotational grazing systems and assess the robustness of the results under different climate scenarios. 3. The two objectives considered have structurally different outcomes. The evaluation under the objective to maximize (risk averse) expected utility indicates a trade-off between mean income and income variability under which farmers would choose one individually optimal management strategy depending on their risk preferences. In contrast, a whole set of strategies is viable under the safety-first objective. Thus, it offers a solution space for decision support rather than selecting a single optimal strategy. 4. Under both objectives, economically preferable strategies share common characteristics: short standing time, large paddock number and reasonably high stocking rate improve the efficiency of a farm enterprise in terms of higher mean income, lower variance, coverage of certain minimum income requirements while preserving pasture quality. 5. Synthesis and applications. The outcomes of this study contribute to both management support at the farm scale and policy advice at the regional scale and beyond. An insight of practical relevance for individual farmers is that a strategy type with high-intensity, shortduration grazing management appears to be most robust under changing climate and economic conditions. Nevertheless, considering individual farmers' objectives is essential for determining the individually optimal strategy. Furthermore, for policymakers, we provide an approach to evaluate policy programmes governing farming activities in terms of effectiveness and implications (particularly side effects). The explicit consideration of the diversity of individual objectives is crucial for avoiding counterproductive incentives and improving sustainability of land-use policies.
机译:1. 复杂相互关系的生态、经济和社会因素。个体农民的目标。相关性已经很少考虑分析农业系统的管理决策。系统地研究分析的作用农民在他们的决策目标在各种气候条件下,旱地放牧系统为例。通用的农林牧渔业仿真模型一系列固定的性能进行比较放牧策略下的两个目标:期望效用最大化下的风险规避和(2)实现随机可行性(的安全第一次”)。在旋转的几个管理组件放牧系统的鲁棒性和评估结果在不同气候情景。两个目标考虑结构不同的结果。目标最大化(风险厌恶)的预期实用表明平均收入之间的权衡和收入变化下的农民选择一个单独优化管理策略取决于他们的风险偏好。相反,一整套策略是可行的在安全第一的目标。空间决策支持而不是解决方案选择一个最优策略。这两个目标,经济上可取的策略的共同特点:短站,大型牧场和数量合理的高载畜率提高企业的效率的一个农场更高的平均收入,降低方差,报道某些最低收入的要求保护草场质量。应用程序。导致在农场管理支持规模和区域规模和政策建议超越。农民是一个策略类型高强度,shortduration放牧管理气候变化下似乎是最强劲的和经济条件。考虑个体农民的目标对于单独确定最优策略。我们提供一种方法来评估政策项目管理农业活动而言(特别是的有效性和意义副作用)。个人目标的多样性是至关重要的避免适得其反激励和提高土地使用政策的可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号