首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >EDITOR'S CHOICE: Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower-visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species?
【24h】

EDITOR'S CHOICE: Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower-visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species?

机译:编辑的选择:加强花园的栖息地采花空中昆虫种群不断减少(传粉者):我们应该种植本地或外来物种?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Domestic gardens typically consist of a mixture of native and non-native plants which support biodiversity and provide valuable ecosystem services, particularly in urban environments. Many gardeners wish to encourage biodiversity by choosing appropriate plant taxa. The value of native and non-native plants in supporting animal biodiversity is, however, largely unknown. The relative value of native and non-native garden plants to invertebrates was investigated in a replicated field experiment. Plots (deliberately akin to garden borders) were planted with one of three treatments, representing assemblages of plants based on origin (native, near-native and exotic). Invertebrates and resource measurements were recorded over fouryears. This paper reports the abundance of flower-visiting aerial insects (pollinators') associated with the three plant assemblages. For all pollinator groups on all treatments, greater floral resource resulted in an increase in visits. There was, however, a greater abundance of total pollinators recorded on native and near-native treatments compared with the exotic plots. Short-tongued bumblebees followed the same pattern whilst more hoverflies were recorded on the native treatment than the other treatments, and more honeybees on the near-native treatment. There was no difference between treatments in abundance of long-tongued bumblebees or solitary bees. The lack of difference in solitary bee abundance between treatments was probably due to a third of individuals from this group being recorded on one exotic plant species. The number of flower visitors corresponded to the peak flowering period of the treatments, that is there were fewer flower visitors to the exotic treatment compared with the other treatments in early summer but relatively more later in the season.Synthesis and applications. This experiment has demonstrated that utilizing plants from only a single region of origin (i.e. nativeness) may not be an optimal strategy for resource provision for pollinating insects in gardens. Gardens can be enhanced as a habitat by planting a variety of flowering plants, biased towards native and near-native species but with a selection of exotics to extend the flowering season and potentially provide resources for specialist groups.
机译:国内园林通常包含的混合物支持本地和非本地植物生物多样性和提供有价值的生态系统服务,尤其是在城市环境中。许多园丁希望鼓励生物多样性选择合适的植物类群。在支持本地和非本地植物的动物然而,生物多样性是不太为人所知。相对价值的本地和非本地的花园植物中无脊椎动物研究复制现场试验。类似于花园种植的边界)三个治疗,代表组合基于起源(本地,本地和植物异国情调的)。记录了四。丰富的采花空中昆虫种群不断减少(传粉者”)与三个工厂组合。治疗,导致更大的花卉资源访问的增加。更丰富的传粉者总记录在本机和本地的治疗比较奇异的情节。遵循同样的模式而花虻记录在本地处理其他治疗方法,和更多的蜜蜂本地的治疗。治疗之间的大量多嘴的大黄蜂或孤独的蜜蜂。单独蜜蜂丰度差异治疗可能是由于第三从这个组被记录在一个个体外来植物物种。游客与开花高峰期的治疗,这是有少花游客奇异的治疗在早期与其他治疗方法相比夏天但相对更晚些时候的季节。实验表明,利用植物只从一个区域(即起源。本土性)可能不是最优的策略资源提供传粉昆虫花园。种植各种各样的开花植物,偏见对本地和本地的物种外来植物的选择延长花期季节和可能提供参考资料专家小组。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号