...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Human trampling disturbance exerts different ecological effects at contrasting elevational range limits
【24h】

Human trampling disturbance exerts different ecological effects at contrasting elevational range limits

机译:人类践踏干扰产生不同在对比高程生态效应范围限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1.Shifts in species geographic distributions in response to climate change have spurred numerous studies to determine which abiotic (e.g.climatic) and,less commonly,biotic (e.g.competitive) processes determine range limits.However,the impact of disturbances on range limits and their interactions with climatic and biotic effects is not well understood,despite their potential to alter competitive relationships between species or override climatic effects.Disturbance might have differential effects at contrasting range limits,based on Darwin's theory that biotic interactions set abiotically benign range limits and abiotic factors set abiotically stressful range limits.2.We predicted that plants at lower elevation (abiotically benign) range limits experience a net positive effect of disturbance,whereas those at higher elevation (abiotically stressful) range limits experience a net neutral effect.We examined plant populations along elevational gradients in the Colorado Rocky Mountains,in order to quantify the effects of human trampling disturbance at lower and upper elevational range limits of the common alpine cushion plants Silene acaulis and Minuartia obtusiloba.3.Our results are consistent with Darwin's theory.A disturbance-mediated reduction of competitive effects increases the performance of cushion plants at lower elevations,suggesting a range limit set by biotic factors.At higher elevations,where biotic interactions are minimal,disturbance has neutral or negative effects on cushion plants.4.Synthesis and applications.Human trampling disturbance exerts differential effects on alpine cushion plant populations at contrasting range limits,emphasizing the need to account for the effects of climate change into the management and conservation of disturbed areas.Disturbance can diminish plant–plant competitive interactions at lower elevational range limits,and thus possibly stabilize alpine species populations susceptible to climate change-mediated encroachment by lower
机译:1.应对气候变化促使众多研究,以确定哪些非生物(e.g.climatic),一般较少,生物(e.g.competitive)流程确定范围的限制。扰动影响范围及其限制与气候相互作用和生物效应不是很清楚,尽管他们的潜力改变竞争物种之间的关系或覆盖气候的影响。在对比范围有差异的影响吗限制,基于达尔文的理论,生物交互集abiotically良性范围限制和非生物因素集abiotically压力limits.2范围。海拔(abiotically良性)范围的限制体验净积极的效果干扰,而在高海拔(abiotically压力)范围限制的经验网络中立的效果。沿高程梯度在科罗拉多洛基山,以量化的影响在上下人类践踏干扰常见的高山高程范围限制缓冲植物硅宾acaulis Minuartiaobtusiloba.3。达尔文的理论。竞争增加性能的影响缓冲的植物在较低海拔,暗示一系列限制由生物因素决定的。海拔,生物相互作用最小,扰动中立或负面的对缓冲plants.4的影响。应用程序。微分对高山垫状植物的影响人口在对比范围限制,强调需要考虑的气候变化影响到管理和保护干扰区域。减少能辨出别有竞争力的相互作用低高程范围限制,因此可能稳定高山物种种群易感气候change-mediated侵占低

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号