...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology. Clinical practice. >Triggers for Referral to Specialized Palliative Care in Advanced Neurologic and Neurosurgical Conditions A Systematic Review
【24h】

Triggers for Referral to Specialized Palliative Care in Advanced Neurologic and Neurosurgical Conditions A Systematic Review

机译:诱因安排专门的缓和在先进的神经和神经外科条件的系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Objectives To systematically review the literature for the most suitable trigger criteria for referral to specialist palliative care services in life-limiting and life-threatening neurologic and neurosurgical conditions. Methods Literature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990-December 2020). To be included, studies must have trigger/referral criteria clearly outlined, a >75% nononcology neurosciences population, and consensus or guidelines documents regarding palliative neurosciences or trigger/referral criteria. We excluded studies that had an oncologic or non-neurosciences population as the main focus of study, trigger and referral criteria not clearly outlined, and no primary or duplicative data. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202013579), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guidelines Process Manual was used to assess for risk of bias. Results Our search identified 1,748 publications, of which 22 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were considered in 2 main groups: (A) studies designed specifically to identify trigger criteria for referral to specialized neuropalliative care services (n = 9) and (B) studies that retrospectively reported the reason for referral to specialized palliative care or reflected a consensus statement among people with advanced neurologic illness (n = 13). Overall, the results suggest that several published referral triggers for specialized neuropalliative care are based on expert consensus. However, there is a growing body of literature providing evidence-based condition-specific triggers for multiple sclerosis, parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and dementia. Discussion There is a growing body of research that outlines evidence-based referral triggers for neuropalliative care. The ambiguity of nomenclature surrounding referral triggers in the current literature and field of neuropalliative care was a limitation to this study. We suggest that condition-specific triggers are likely to be the most effective for identifying the appropriate patients and timing for referral to specialist palliative care. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020135791, crd.york.ac.uk/prospero)
机译:背景和目标系统地审查最合适的触发的文学标准推荐专家姑息护理服务上来危及生命的神经和神经外科条件。在奥维德MEDLINE和EMBASE进行(1990 - 2020年12月)。必须有触发/转诊标准清晰吗概述,> 75% nononcology神经科学人口,共识或指南文档关于缓和神经科学或触发/推荐标准。有一个肿瘤或non-neurosciences人口作为研究的主要焦点,触发器和转诊标准没有明确列出没有主要的或重复的数据。注册与普洛斯彼罗(CRD4202013579)首选项报告系统的评论随访和荟萃分析指导方针。美国神经病学学会的临床实践指南手册是用来评估过程偏见的风险。出版物,其中22日会见了文章合格标准。2主要群体:(一)专门研究确定触发推荐标准专业neuropalliative保健服务(n = 9)和(B)回顾性的研究报道原因安排专门的缓和护理或共识声明中反映出来先进的神经疾病患者(n = 13)。总的来说,结果表明,几个出版专业推荐触发器neuropalliative保健是基于专家共识。文学提供以证据为基础的condition-specific触发多个硬化、帕金森症、肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化,和痴呆。越来越多的研究,概述了以证据为基础的推荐诱因neuropalliative护理。命名周边转诊触发的当前的文学和neuropalliative领域护理是一个限制。可能是condition-specific触发器最有效的识别适当的病人和时间安排专家姑息治疗。注册号:CRD42020135791,crd.york.ac.uk /普洛斯彼罗)

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号