首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Are Patagonia grasslands being overgrazed? A response to Marino et al. (2020)
【24h】

Are Patagonia grasslands being overgrazed? A response to Marino et al. (2020)

机译:巴塔哥尼亚草原被过度放牧时?应对马里诺et al . (2020)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. Based upon primary productivity estimates, Oliva et al. (2019) concluded that, at the end of last century and after long periods of overgrazing, Patagonia's domestic stocks adjusted to regional-scale herbivore carrying capacity. Populations of guanaco, a native camelid, increased thereafter, driving combined grazing pressures once again over carrying capacity in some areas. 2. Marino et al. (2020) argued that grazing is not really at equilibrium because domestic stocks are concentrated in areas that remain overgrazed. They support the ideas that guanaco density is auto-regulated by resource-defence territoriality, and that guanacos are weak competitors with domestic stock, occupying only marginal areas. In their view, Oliva et al. (2019) put guanacos in the role of scapegoats, leaving domestic stocks unchecked. 3. Equilibrium at regional scale does not preclude overgrazing and under-grazing at local scales. By separating areas with and without domestic stocks, Marino et al. (2020) estimated overgrazing at 28% in Chubut Province and 73% in Santa Cruz Province. Our recalculations show 28% and 47% domestic overgrazing, respectively. However, when combined with guanaco densities, these increase to 48% for Chubut and 108% for Santa Cruz. 4. We question the hypothesised lack of competitive value and efficient selfregulating mechanisms that would prevent guanaco populations from overshooting carrying capacity. A dataset of 13 sheep farms showed mean density of 26 ± 3.8 guanacos/km~2 and high combined grazing pressures. This was also observed in a protected area of Chubut that reached 42 guanacos/km~2 and crashed during drought, with 60% mortality. Thereafter, guanacos increased to 70 guanacos/ km~2, with recruitment rates that showed a complex response of density dependence but remained relatively elevated at densities above the estimated carrying capacity. 5. Synthesis and applications. Marino et al. (2020) are right to question the apparent equilibrium of domestic st
机译:1. 奥利瓦et al。(2019)得出结论,结束时上个世纪,经过长时间的过度放牧,巴塔哥尼亚的国内股市调整对地区级的核食草动物承载能力。的南美的一个本地骆驼科,增加之后,开车放牧相结合压力再次超过承载能力一些地区。不是真正的平衡,因为吃草国内股票集中的地区保持过度放牧时。美洲驼密度自动调控resource-defence领土权,南美的薄弱与国内竞争对手股票,只占据边缘地区。视图,奥利瓦et al。(2019)把南美替罪羊的角色,使得国内股票无节制的。不排除过度放牧和放牧不足当地的尺度。没有国内股票,马里诺et al。(2020)估计过度放牧丘布特省28%在圣克鲁斯省73%。重新计算显示国内28%和47%过度放牧,分别。与南美的密度,这些增加到48%丘布特圣克鲁斯和108%。4。提出缺乏价值和竞争力高效selfregulating机制防止美洲驼人口过度承载能力。显示平均密度的26±3.8 ~ 2和南美/公里高总和放牧压力。观察的丘布特保护区达到42南美/公里~ 2和时坠毁干旱,死亡率为60%。增加到70 ~ 2南美/公里,与招聘率密度显示的复杂反应但保持相对较高的依赖密度高于估计的承载能力。5. (2020)问题明显是正确的平衡国内圣

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号