首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >What is unmanaged forest and how does it sustain biodiversity in landscapes with a long history of intensive forestry?
【24h】

What is unmanaged forest and how does it sustain biodiversity in landscapes with a long history of intensive forestry?

机译:非托管森林是什么和它是如何维持生物多样性与历史悠久的风景密集的森林吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. A recent paper by Schall et al. (2020) concluded that beech forests managed in even-aged (EA) rotation systems were more efficient than unmanaged (UNM) forest and forest managed in uneven-aged (UEA) selective cutting systems in supporting landscape-scale biodiversity in Germany. 2. The authors based their conclusion on a comprehensive multitaxon survey and a promising resampling model for assessing gamma diversity at landscape scale. Here, we challenge their conclusions and evaluate the importance of UNM forests for conservation of forest biodiversity. 3. The average amount of deadwood reported from EA stands (27.8 m~3/ha) was almost 30% higher than reported from UNM stands (21.6 m~3/ha) in the study. Averages from long UNM temperate forests in Europe are typically six to seven times higher (131-157 m~3/ha). We therefore conclude the UNM studied stands to reflect legacies of former management, and to be poorly representative of UNM forests. Data from our own studies, including long UNM beech stands in Denmark, demonstrate how this shortcoming seriously undermines the general validity of the presented results to conservation of forest biodiversity. 4. Synthesis and applications. Preservation and restoration of intact forest ecosystems remains essential to biodiversity conservation. We show that the findings of Schall et al. (2020) do not contradict this important notion. Schall and colleagues identified UEA management systems as potentially inferior to more traditional EA management systems for conserving forest biodiversity at the landscape scale. The paper also provides insight into the limited short-term conservation value of simply abandoning forest management in intensively managed landscapes. Based on this, we call for discarding the current orthodox view of non-intervention when new forest reserves are created in temperate Europe. Active reinforcement of natural disturbance regimes and active habitat creation may lead to faster recovery of natural stand str
机译:1. 得出的结论是,在同龄林分山毛榉森林管理(EA)旋转系统更有效的比非托管(新)森林和森林管理异龄(UEA)选择性切割系统支持生物多样性景观尺度德国。2。multitaxon综合调查和一个有前途的重采样模型评估γ多样性景观尺度。结论和评价在野势力的重要性森林保护森林生物多样性。3.EA站(27.8米~ 3 /公顷)几乎高出30%比报告的新墨西哥大学站(21.6米~ 3 /公顷)这项研究。森林在欧洲通常是6到7倍(131 - 157 m ~ 3 /公顷)。新墨西哥大学研究的结论来反映前的遗产管理和糟糕代表在野势力的森林。研究,包括长在野势力的山毛榉站在丹麦,证明这个缺点严重破坏的一般有效性结果提出保护森林生物多样性。原始森林的保护和恢复生态系统是生物多样性的关键保护。et al .(2020)没有反驳这一重要的概念。管理系统可能不如更传统的EA管理系统保护森林生物多样性的景观规模。有限的短期保护简单的价值放弃森林管理集中管理景观。丢弃当前的正统观点当新的森林保护区不干涉创建在温带欧洲。自然干扰政权和活跃的栖息地自然的创建可能导致更快的恢复str站

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号